I'm trying to improve my methods for calculating real-time US Equity option portfolio risk.
My main problem is volatility "stability" across all strikes in an option series.

The current implementation is similar to the OCC Haircut calculations, where I calculate volatility at current market prices and then calculate theoretical prices for all options at 10 equidistant percentage moves of the underlying up and down.

My problem is generally with deep ITM/OTM options that have a short time to maturity and/or wide bid-ask spreads, no bids, etc. I often see call vs. put IV's severely out of whack which in turn causes deltas to be incorrect (especially for portfolios that do large reversals/conversions for dividend plays). I'm using a dividend forecast feed in my current pricing models (Escrow method).

I was wondering if it would be better to extrapolate the skew curve from the ATM options to estimate volatility at further strikes? Are there any programmatic examples out there that describe and handle this situation?



1 Answer 1


Generally, you should ignore deep in-the-money option prices because they are far less liquid (due to their low leverage). That lets you use just the calls on the high strikes and just the puts on the low strikes.

For your purposes, you can cap the volatility at, say, the highest mid-market volatility of all puts having both a bid and an offer. This cut-off to the skew will keep your valuations and risk fairly sane.

You would not want to make markets off such an ugly skew but it is OK for doing risk and scenarios.

For a more involved approach, see here:

Is there a popular curve fitting formula of options skew vs strike price or vs Delta?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.