3
$\begingroup$

Having two correlated Ito processes ($W_t^1$ and $W_t^2$ are correlated Brownian motions with correlation $\rho$)

$dX_{t} =\mu_{1} dt + \sigma_1 dWt_1 $

$dY_{t} = \mu_{2} dt + \sigma_2 dWt_2 $

How can the below be proven algebraically ?

$\sqrt{\sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2 +2 \sigma_1 \sigma_2 \rho} \ \ dW_t = \sigma_1 dW_t^1 + \sigma_2 dW_t^2$

|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are you trying to express it in terms of a third Brownian motion or in term of either one of $W^1$ or $W^2$? $\endgroup$ – SRKX Apr 26 '16 at 4:25
5
$\begingroup$

What can be shown is that the above expressions are equal in probability. First check the distribution. As any linear combination of a Gaussian is Gaussian the right hand side is Gaussian - the left hand side too. Then we need the 2 moments:

The expected values - it is zero ... easy to see.

Next what you did not specify is that the correlation between $dW_t^1$ and $dW_t^2$ is $\rho$ then the variance can be calculated by $$ VAR[\sigma_1dW_t^1+\sigma_2dW_t^2] = \sigma_1^2 VAR[dW_t^1] + 2 \sigma_1 \sigma_2 Covar[dW_t^1,dW_t^2] + \sigma_2^2 VAR[dW_t^2] $$ which equals $$ \sigma_1^2 dt + 2 \sigma_1 \sigma_2 \rho dt + \sigma_2^2 dt. $$

On the other hand the variance of the lhs: $$ VAR[\sqrt{\sigma_1^2 + 2 \sigma_1 \sigma_2 \rho+ \sigma_2^2} dW_t] = (\sigma_1^2 + 2 \sigma_1 \sigma_2 \rho+ \sigma_2^2) VAR[dW_t] $$ and this is $$ (\sigma_1^2 + 2 \sigma_1 \sigma_2 \rho + \sigma_2^2) dt, $$ exactly what we needed.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nice answer but just a pedantic remark: $\text{VAR}[dW_t^i] = dt$ not $t$, same point for covariance. $\endgroup$ – Quantuple Apr 26 '16 at 7:42
  • $\begingroup$ I have changed this just some seconds ago ;) $\endgroup$ – Ric Apr 26 '16 at 7:43
  • $\begingroup$ Wow that was fast ;) $\endgroup$ – Quantuple Apr 26 '16 at 7:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Quantuple Also, pedantically : $\textrm{VAR}[dW_t^i]$ has no mathematical meaning. ;-) $\endgroup$ – Olorin Apr 14 '19 at 18:22
  • $\begingroup$ the dXYZ notion is not perfect but you get used to it, right? ;) $\endgroup$ – Ric Apr 15 '19 at 18:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.