Hi I am looking for some general clarification to Heath–Jarrow–Morton framework. I am analyzing a problem where the forward rate is modeled as $$ f(t,T)=e^{\beta(T-t)} Z_t+h(T-t) \tag{1}$$ for some constant $\beta$ and some smooth function $h:R \rightarrow \ R \ with \quad h(0)=0$ and some scalar diffusion $$dZt=b(Z_t)dt+\rho dW_t^* \tag{2}$$ with continuous drift and functions $b(z)$ and $\rho(z)$.

To show that HJM drift condition implies that $\ \mathbf{b(z)=b+\beta z} \ $ and $\ \mathbf{(\rho)^2=\alpha} \ $ for some constant b and $\alpha$

Can anybody explain in simple terms what this above statement mean? what needs to be showed/proved? I am confused here what is the relation between the variables given in the equations (1) and (2) with those $\alpha$ and b.

There is the analyzes I have done on this problem. I understand the most of the transformations, but some points are unclear.

Taking the derivative of $f(t,T)$ in order to get $df(t,T)$ and substituting for $dz_t$ I get $$df(t,T)=\big{(} -h'(T-t)+e^{\beta(T-t)}(b(z_t)-\beta z) \big{)} \ dt+e^{\beta(T-t)} \rho(z_t) dW_t^* \tag{3} $$ the Q-dynamics of the forward rates in HJM framework are of the form $$f(t,T)=f(0,T) + \int_0^t \big{(} \sigma(s,T) \int_s^T \sigma(s,u) \ du \big{)} \ ds + \int_0^t \sigma(s,T) dW_t^* \tag{4}$$ or equivalently $$ df(t,T)= \sigma(t,T) \int_t^T \sigma(t,u) \ du + \sigma(s,T) dW_t^*\tag{5}$$ therefore the HJM drift equals $$e^{\beta(T-t)} \rho(z_t) \int_t^T e^{\beta(u-t)} \rho(z_t) \ du =\rho(z_t)^2 e^{\beta(T-t)} \frac{ e^{-\beta t}}{\beta} (e^{\beta T} - e^{\beta t}) \tag{6}$$ equating HJM drift with drift from eq (3) and substituting for $\tau=T-t$ yields the following equity $$ \frac{\rho(z_t)^2}{\beta} e^{\beta \tau} (e^{\beta \tau} - 1) = -h'(\tau)+e^{\beta \tau}(b(z_t)-\beta z) \tag{7}$$ assuming $\tau=0$ results in $$ b(z)=h'(0)+\beta z \tag{8}$$ comparing with the given equation $$b(z)=b+ \beta z \tag{9}$$ we can infer that $b=h'(0)$ finally plugging $b(z)$ (8) into (7) gives the $alpha$ value $$\rho^2= \frac{\beta(e^{\beta \tau} h'(0)- h'(t))}{e^{\beta \tau}(e^{\beta \tau}-1)} \tag{10}$$ $$\alpha=\rho^2$$

Further questions to this problem
b and $\alpha$ have been derived from the drift condition. I don't understand in what sense does it prove the initial question?
Does it implicitly mean that the RHS of (10) is a constant?
what is the relation between the HJM drift and the coefficient of $dW_t^ *$ in (3)?

  • $\begingroup$ Should $h(T-1)$ be $h(T-t)$ in (1)? $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    May 9, 2016 at 17:57
  • $\begingroup$ @Gordon , you are right, it should be h(T-t) there I corrected the typo, sorry $\endgroup$
    – Michal
    May 9, 2016 at 20:59
  • $\begingroup$ I made some further typo corrections. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    May 9, 2016 at 22:44

1 Answer 1


You almost get there. However, you ca not conclude that $\rho^2$ is a constant based on $(10)$. Note that, from your $(7)$ and $(8)$, \begin{align*} \frac{\rho(z_t)^2}{\beta} e^{\beta \tau} (e^{\beta \tau} - 1) = -h'(\tau)+e^{\beta \tau}h'(0). \end{align*} Taking derivative with respect to $\tau$ on both sides, we obtain that \begin{align*} \frac{\rho(z_t)^2}{\beta} \left(2\beta e^{2\beta \tau} -\beta e^{\beta \tau}\right) = -h''(\tau)+\beta e^{\beta \tau}h'(0). \end{align*} Then, setting $\tau=0$, \begin{align*} \rho(z_t)^2 = -h''(0)+\beta h'(0). \end{align*} That is, $\rho(z_t)^2=\alpha$ is a constant, where $\alpha = -h''(0)+\beta h'(0)$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.