3
$\begingroup$

Suppose $dA_t = A_t[\mu dt+\sigma dW_t]$ (assets' value) under the physical measure, plus the other assumptions of the Merton model.

Suppose further that debt and equity are tradeable assets that satisfy $A_t = D_t+E_t$ and follow processes $D_t = D(t,A_t)$, $E_t = E(t,A_t)$ for differentiable functions.

By considering a locally risk-free self-financing portfolio of bonds and equity(which by necessity will earn the risk-free rate of return), prove directly that both $D$, $E$ satisfy the Black-Scholes equation: $$\partial_t f+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 A^2 \partial_A^2 f+r A \partial_A f-r f = 0$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ This looks like you copy-pasted and exercise from somewhere. Did you try solving it on your own? Where are you stuck? $\endgroup$
    – SRKX
    Commented May 23, 2016 at 10:09
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, it's an exercise taken from Hurd notes, UToronto. I actually can't get how to set the problem up. I went through the similar derivation of the Black-Scholes-Merton model in Hull and I can't really get the differences. It seems to fit to this problem too but I know it can't be the same. $\endgroup$
    – davidpaich
    Commented May 23, 2016 at 18:05

3 Answers 3

4
$\begingroup$

We construct a locally risk-free self-financing portfolio $X_t$, at time $t$, with $\Delta_t^1$ share of debt and $\Delta_t^2$ share of equity. That is, \begin{align*} X_t = \Delta_t^1 D_t + \Delta_t^2 E_t. \end{align*} Then, \begin{align*} dX_t &=\Delta_t^1 dD_t + \Delta_t^2 dE_t\\ &=\Delta_t^1\bigg[\Big(\frac{\partial D_t}{\partial t} + \mu A_t\frac{\partial D_t}{\partial A_t} + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 D_t }{\partial A_t^2}\Big)dt + \sigma A_t \frac{\partial D_t}{\partial A_t} dW_t \bigg]\\ &\quad + \Delta_t^2\bigg[\Big(\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial t} + \mu A_t \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t} + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 E_t }{\partial A_t^2}\Big)dt + \sigma A_t \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t} dW_t \bigg]. \end{align*} Since $X_t$ is locally risk-free, \begin{align*} \Delta_t^1\frac{\partial D_t}{\partial A_t} + \Delta_t^2\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}=0. \tag{1} \end{align*} Moreover, since $X_t$ earn the risk-free rate $r$, \begin{align*} dX_t = rX_t dt. \end{align*} From $(1)$, \begin{align*} r\Delta_t^1 D_t dt + r\Delta_t^2 E_t dt &= \Delta_t^1\Big(\frac{\partial D_t}{\partial t} + \mu A_t \frac{\partial D_t}{\partial A_t} + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 D_t }{\partial A_t^2}\Big)dt \\ &\quad + \Delta_t^2\Big(\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial t} + \mu A_t \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t} + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 E_t }{\partial A_t^2}\Big)dt. \end{align*} That is, \begin{align*} &\Delta_t^1\Big(\frac{\partial D_t}{\partial t} + \mu A_t \frac{\partial D_t}{\partial A_t}+\frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 D_t }{\partial A_t^2} - rD_t \Big)dt \\ &+ \Delta_t^2\Big(\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial t} +\mu A_t \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}+ \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 E_t }{\partial A_t^2}-rE_t\Big)dt =0. \tag{2} \end{align*} Since $A_t = E_t + D_t$, \begin{align*} \frac{\partial D_t}{\partial t} &= -\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial t},\tag{3}\\ \frac{\partial D_t}{\partial A_t} &= 1- \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t},\tag{4}\\ \frac{\partial^2 D_t }{\partial A_t^2} &= - \frac{\partial^2 E_t }{\partial A_t^2}.\tag{5} \end{align*} From $(1)$ and $(2)$, \begin{align*} &-\Delta_t^2\frac{\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}}{\frac{\partial D_t}{\partial A_t}}\Big(\frac{\partial D_t}{\partial t} + \mu A_t \frac{\partial D_t}{\partial A_t}+\frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 D_t }{\partial A_t^2} - rD_t \Big) \\ & \quad + \Delta_t^2\Big(\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial t} +\mu A_t \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}+ \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 E_t }{\partial A_t^2}-rE_t\Big) =0. \end{align*} Then, from $(3)$-$(5)$, and multiplying $\frac{\partial D_t}{\partial A_t}=1-\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}$ on both sides, \begin{align*} &-\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}\bigg[-\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial t} + \mu A_t \Big(1-\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}\Big)-\frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 E_t }{\partial A_t^2} - r(A_t-E_t) \bigg] \\ & \quad + \Big(1- \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}\Big)\Big(\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial t} +\mu A_t \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}+ \sigma^2 \frac{1}{2} A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 E_t }{\partial A_t^2}-rE_t\Big) \\ =&\ \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial t} - \mu A_t \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t} + \mu A_t \left(\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}\right)^2 + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}\frac{\partial^2 E_t }{\partial A_t^2} +r(A_t-E_t)\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t} \\ &\quad - \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial t} -\mu A_t \left(\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}\right)^2 - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}\frac{\partial^2 E_t }{\partial A_t^2}+rE_t\frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t} \\ &\quad + \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial t} +\mu A_t \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}+ \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 E_t }{\partial A_t^2}-rE_t \\ =& \ \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial t} +r A_t \frac{\partial E_t}{\partial A_t}+ \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 A_t^2 \frac{\partial^2 E_t }{\partial A_t^2}-rE_t =0.\tag{6} \end{align*} Since $A_t$ also satisfies $(6)$, then so does $D_t$. The derivation is this complete.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

You need the derivation of BS eq.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes_equation#Derivation

where in your setup you need S = V and case 1: V = E, case 2: V = D.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$
  1. Use Ito's lemma to get dD
  2. Use dE = dV - dD
  3. Form a weighted portfolio of D and E, lets call it V, where the weights sum to 1
  4. Use the self-financing to get the dynamics of V
  5. Find the weights that makes V risk-free
  6. Set the drift of V equal to r
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.