As you can see from the wiki page, the delta of a put is
$$\Delta = -e^{-qT}N(-d_1)= -e^{-qT} \left(1-N(d_1)\right)$$
Recall that this $\Delta$ is the derivative of the value of the put $p$ with respect to the value of the underlying stock $S$: $\frac{\partial p}{\partial S}$.
So this means that if the underlying goes up by 1, the price of the put change by $\Delta$. Clearly, you see that for puts $\Delta \leq 0$, which means that if the value of the underlying goes up, the put value goes down.
Let's say you have asset $S_0=100$ and you want to replicate a put which would have a $\Delta=-0.25$, then you sell you $0.25$ the stock.
Say the value next day is $S_1 = 80$:
Assume you have a portfolio of $S$ and a put $p$:
- Value at $t=0$: $S_0 + p_0 = 100 + p_0$
- Value at $t=1$: $S_1 + p_1 = S_1 + (S_1 - S_0 )\Delta + p_0 = 80 + (-20) \cdot (-0.25) + p_0 = 85+p_0$
- The PnL is $(85+p_0) - (100 + p_0) = -15$.
Assume now you don't buy the put but you replicate by investing $\Delta$ of the stock:
- Value at $t=0$: $S_0 + \Delta S_0 = (1+\Delta)S_0 = 0.75 \cdot 100 = 75$
- Value at $t=1$: $(1+\Delta)S_1 = 0.75 \cdot 80 = 60$
- The PnL is $-15$ as well
You replicated the option (that's the idea to be perfectly correct you indeed need to invest the proceeds at risk free indeed, that's essentially because $p_0$ doesn't move exactly by $\Delta$).