Assume that futures price $F(t,T)$ follows the Ito process as described by the following stochastic process

$$ln F(t,T)=lnF(0,T)+(Z_1(t)e^{-k(T-t)}+Z_2(t))-(1/4k)[(1-e^{-2kT})(h_1^2+h_2^2))+4h_1h_0(1-e^{-kT})+2h_0^2tk]$$

where $Z_1(t)$ and $Z_2(t)$ are state variables following:



Assume $W_1$ and $W_2$ are independent. How to derive kalman filter update/measurement equations to estimate the parameters $h_0,h_1,h_2,k$? Observations are $lnF(t,T)$. Many Thanks

  • $\begingroup$ Maybe Euler discretisation? $\endgroup$
    – Egodym
    Jun 19 '16 at 20:25
  • $\begingroup$ You may want to have a look of the book "Time Series Analysis" by Hamilton. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    Jun 20 '16 at 14:53

Consider historical observation dates $t_0 < t_1 < \cdots < t_n$. From the state variable equations \begin{align*} dZ_t^1&=-kZ_t^1dt+h_1dW_t^1+h_2dW_t^2,\\ dZ_t^2&=h_0dW_t^1. \end{align*} We obtain that, for $i=1, \ldots, n$, \begin{align*} Z_{t_i}^1 &= e^{-k \Delta t_i} Z_{t_{i-1}}^1 + h_1 \int_{t_{i-1}}^{t_i}e^{-k (t_i-s)}dW_s^1 + h_2 \int_{t_{i-1}}^{t_i}e^{-k (t_i-s)}dW_s^2,\tag{1}\\ Z_{t_i}^2 &= Z_{t_{i-1}}^2 + h_0 \int_{t_{i-1}}^{t_i}dW_s^1.\tag{2} \end{align*} Let \begin{align*} \pmb{x}_{t_i} &= [Z_{t_i}^1, \ Z_{t_i}^2]^T, \end{align*} and \begin{align*} F &= \left(\! \begin{array}{cc} e^{-k\Delta t_i} & 0\\ 0 & 1 \end{array} \!\right). \end{align*} Moreover, let \begin{align*} \pmb{v}_{t_i} = \bigg[h_1 \int_{t_{i-1}}^{t_i}e^{-k (t_i-s)}dW_s^1 + h_2 \int_{t_{i-1}}^{t_i}e^{-k (t_i-s)}dW_s^2, \ h_0 \int_{t_{i-1}}^{t_i}dW_s^1\bigg]^T \end{align*} be a two dimensional normal random vector with zero mean and covariance matrix \begin{align*} Q = \left(\! \begin{array}{cc} \frac{h_1^2+h_2^2}{2k}\big(1-e^{-2k \Delta t_i} \big) & \frac{h_0h_1}{k} \big(1-e^{-k\Delta t_i} \big) \\ \frac{h_0h_1}{k} \big(1-e^{-k\Delta t_i} \big) & h_0^2 \Delta t_i \end{array} \!\right). \end{align*} Then, based on $(1)$ and $(2)$, \begin{align*} \pmb{x}_{t_i} = F \pmb{x}_{t_{i-1}} + \pmb{v}_{t_i}, \end{align*} which is the transition equation or state equation.

Let $T_1 < \cdots < T_m$ be the futures maturities. From the equation \begin{align*} \ln F(t,T)&=\ln F(0,T)+\left(Z_t^1 e^{-k(T-t)}+Z_t^2\right) \\ &\qquad -\frac{1}{4k}\left[(1-e^{-2kT})(h_1^2+h_2^2))+4h_1h_0(1-e^{-kT})+2h_0^2tk\right], \end{align*} we obtain that \begin{align*} \ln F(t_i,T_j)&=\ln F(0,T_j)+\left(Z_{t_i}^1 e^{-k(T_j-t_i)}+Z_{t_i}^2\right) \\ &\qquad -\frac{1}{4k}\left[(1-e^{-2kT_j})(h_1^2+h_2^2))+4h_1h_0(1-e^{-kT_j})+2h_0^2t_ik\right].\tag{3} \end{align*} For observation time $t_i$, let $\pmb{y}_{t_i}$ be an $m$-dimensional observation vector defined by \begin{align*} \pmb{y}_{t_i} = \left(\! \begin{array}{c} \ln F(t_i, T_1)\\ \vdots\\ \ln F(t_i, T_m) \end{array} \!\right), \end{align*} and $\pmb{d}_{t_i}$ be an $m$-dimensional deterministic vector defined by \begin{align*} \pmb{d}_{t_i} = \left(\! \begin{array}{c} \ln F(0,T_1) - \frac{1}{4k}\left[(1-e^{-2kT_1})(h_1^2+h_2^2))+4h_1h_0(1-e^{-kT_1})+2h_0^2t_ik\right]\\ \phantom{\frac{\frac{1}{1}}{\frac{1}{1}}} \vdots \phantom{\frac{\frac{1}{1}}{\frac{1}{1}}}\\ \ln F(0,T_m) - \frac{1}{4k}\left[(1-e^{-2kT_m})(h_1^2+h_2^2))+4h_1h_0(1-e^{-kT_m})+2h_0^2t_ik\right] \end{array} \!\right). \end{align*} Moreover, let $H$ be an $(m \times 2)$ matrix defined by \begin{align*} H = \left(\! \begin{array}{cc} e^{-k(T_1-t_i)} & 1\\ \phantom{\frac{\frac{1}{1}}{\frac{1}{1}}}\vdots\phantom{\frac{\frac{1}{1}}{\frac{1}{1}}} & \vdots\\ e^{-k(T_m-t_i)} & 1 \end{array} \!\right), \end{align*} and $\pmb{w}_{t_i}$ is an $m$-dimensional normal random vector with zero mean and a constant covariance matrix $V$, to be defined below. Then, based on Equation $(3)$, \begin{equation}\label{spot_forward_measurement_eqn} \pmb{y}_{t_i} = \pmb{d}_{t_i} + H \pmb{x}_{t_i} +\pmb{w}_{t_i}, \end{equation} which is the measurement equation or observation equation. Here $\pmb{w}_{t_i}$ is a $m$-dimensional vector of normal random variables. The $(m \times m)$ covariance matrix $V$ of $\pmb{w}_{t_i}$ is determined, together with the model parameters, as part of the maximum likelihood estimation.

  • $\begingroup$ Gordon, appreciated. I 'm learning the book you specified and will get back to your answer later. $\endgroup$
    – snowave
    Jun 20 '16 at 21:24
  • $\begingroup$ @snowave: The format of my answer is based on that book. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    Jun 20 '16 at 21:25
  • $\begingroup$ Your vector c_ti is zero, right? $\endgroup$
    – snowave
    Jun 21 '16 at 21:36
  • $\begingroup$ @snowave: yes. Revised. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    Jun 21 '16 at 22:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.