5
$\begingroup$

What is the probability that the arithmetic OU process $dx_t= \theta(\mu-x_t)dt+\sigma dW_t$ hits barrier $U$ before hitting barrier $L$ when $L<x_0<U$ ?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Assuming $\theta>0$ (take $\tilde{X}=\mu-X$ if it is not the case)

Let us denote $\text{erfi}(x)$ the imaginary error function Let us denote $\tau_L$,resp.$\tau_U$ the hitting time of $L$resp.$U$ where $L<U$

1) Using Ito's lemma, prove that : $$Y_t = \text{erfi}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\theta}{\sigma^2}}\left(X_t-\mu\right)\right) \text{ is a martingale}$$

2) Using optimal stopping theorem, prove that : $$\mathbb{P}(\tau_L\leq \tau_U) = \frac{\text{erfi}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\theta}{\sigma^2}}\left(x_0-\mu\right)\right)-\text{erfi}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\theta}{\sigma^2}}\left(U-\mu\right)\right)}{\text{erfi}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\theta}{\sigma^2}}\left(L-\mu\right)\right)-\text{erfi}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\theta}{\sigma^2}}\left(U-\mu\right)\right)}$$

$\endgroup$
13
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, I'll have a look. But is $\beta$ meant to be $\sigma$ ? $\endgroup$
    – OldSchool
    Jul 15, 2016 at 10:14
  • $\begingroup$ you're right, I correct it $\endgroup$ Jul 15, 2016 at 12:30
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Very nice technique. If you can put more details, more people are able to appreciate it. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    Jul 16, 2016 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ I appreciate your taking the time to respond to this question. Having looked at your answer, a plot of the given $P( T_L ≤ T_U )$ over the range of possible $x_0$'s between $L$ and $U$, seems wrong (the convexity seems to be the wrong way). If I change the signs of $(x_0-μ), (U-μ)$ and $(L-μ)$ to $(x_0+μ), (U+μ)$ and $(L+μ)$ I can get a plausible plot. However, simulations consistently show much greater probability of touching U than this formula suggests, when $x_0$ is near $L$ and μ is set near or beyond U,. I may be doing something wrong, but is it worth checking your answer? $\endgroup$
    – OldSchool
    Jul 17, 2016 at 7:49
  • $\begingroup$ $\mathbb{P}(\tau_L\leq \tau_U)=1-\mathbb{P}(\tau_U <\tau_L) $ I.e the probability to hit L before U is equal to 1 minus the probability to hit U before L. I admit I answer not exactly to your question. Sorry. $\endgroup$ Jul 17, 2016 at 8:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.