I am self-studying from a manual on financial economics, and I am trying to completely wrap my head around this solution:

enter image description here

I'm trying to fill in the in-between steps of this solution based on first principles, so please tell me if my understanding is correct (I'll be referencing the paragraph from the textbook shown below my solution):

The rate of return over a one year period is $S_1/S_0$. The expected rate of return is $\textbf{E}[S_1/S_0].$

The problem is therefore asking to find $\text{Pr}[S_1/S_0 < \textbf{E}[S_1/S_0]]$.

Now $S_1/S_0$ is lognormally distributed, so we have:

$\text{Pr}[\ln(S_1/S_0) < \ln(\textbf{E}[S_1/S_0])] = \text{Pr}[\ln(S_1/S_0) < \alpha]$.

We have that $\ln(S_1/S_0)$ is normally distributed with parameters $m = 0.1 - 0.5(0.30)^2 = 0.055$ and $v = 0.30$.

Hence $\text{Pr}[\ln(S_1/S_0) < \alpha] = \text{Pr}[z < (\alpha - m)/v] = N(\frac{0.1 - 0.055}{0.3}) = N(0.15) = 0.55962$.

enter image description here

My question is:

  1. Is the logic of the in-between steps correct? Please correct any detail that I don't have quite right.

  2. What does the author mean by the quantile of the expected return, and why is that helpful?

  1. Yes, your steps are valid
  2. This is a wrong use of the term "quantile". Here you need to compute a probability (through the normal cdf) and not a quantile (i.e. the value of a random variable corresponding to a given level of the cdf, e.g. the quantile 0.5 (or percentile 50%) is the median)
| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.