2
$\begingroup$

Assume I use some finite difference solver to solve for American type of exercise in BS framework where stock pays dividend discretely. Then at every time iteration, for call option, I firstly adjust for dividends and then account for early exercise by taking a max between intrinsic value and "value to hold".

Should I swap the order in a case of a put? Should I first adjust for early exercise and after for a dividend?

The reason I am in doubt is because with a call I better exercise right before the dividend and with a put right after. Is that correct?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I would recommend to do both.

Consider the situation where a single discrete dividend is paid at $t$. You use a Finite Difference (FD) scheme to price a European option. Starting from the terminal condition at $T$, by backward induction you manage to obtain the solution $$V(t^+, \mathcal{S})$$ for a discrete grid of spot levels $\mathcal{S}$ at time $t^+$. For the moment, it is as if you did not consider dividends.

Now, because the stock goes ex at $t$, the no-jump condition writes: $$V(t^-,\mathcal{S}) = V(t^+,\mathcal{S}-D) \tag{1}$$

When you talk about "accounting for the dividend payment", I assume you talk about the transformation $V(t^+,\mathcal{S}) \to V(t^-,\mathcal{S})$ you need to take care of before being able to resume your FD backward stepping up to time $t=0$. From $(1)$ you know that $V(t^+,\mathcal{S}) \to V(t^-,\mathcal{S})=V(t^+,\mathcal{S}-D)$. This means you can (for instance) perform an interpolation to find $V(t^+,\mathcal{S}-D)$ from $V(t^+,\mathcal{S})$ and set $V(t^-,\mathcal{S})$ equal to the result.

For American options I would advise to do, when you reach time step $t$

  • Once you get $V(t^+,\mathcal{S})$, do $V(t^+,\mathcal{S}) = \max( V(t^+,\mathcal{S}), (\phi(\mathcal{S}-K))^+)$ = check for optimal exercise opportunity after a dividend payment
  • Account for the dividend payment $V(t^+,\mathcal{S}) \to V(t^-,\mathcal{S})=V(t^+,\mathcal{S}-D)$ = account for dividend payment
  • Once you get $V(t^-,\mathcal{S})$, do $V(t^-,\mathcal{S}) = \max( V(t^-,\mathcal{S}), (\phi(\mathcal{S}-K))^+)$ = check for optimal exercise opportunity before a dividend payment
  • Move backward to previous time step $t-\Delta t$... and repeat.

with $\phi=\pm1$ for call/put respectively.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ It certainly will find that max over all stopping times I am looking for but it is extra work that could be avoided. I just don't get why in all the books/papers only calls are considered! Or perhaps one can just make a comparison between the two orders(dividends, then American and vice versa) to see which one provides a greater number... $\endgroup$
    – Medan
    Aug 10, 2016 at 17:22
  • $\begingroup$ @Medan It cannot be done otherwise IMHO, except if you are willing to add an if clause to distinguish put vs call. But again what would you do with a more general payoff which is callable at a particular date which coincides with a dividend? If you want to have only 1 pricer this is the way to go $\endgroup$
    – Quantuple
    Aug 10, 2016 at 17:33
  • $\begingroup$ And this extra work is just adding a line after having dealt with dividends (simply taking the max), I don't think this constitutes some kind of bottleneck $\endgroup$
    – Quantuple
    Aug 10, 2016 at 17:33
  • $\begingroup$ I agree that this would be a more general pricer. Just though to find the most optimal solution here for the particular case of a put. $\endgroup$
    – Medan
    Aug 10, 2016 at 18:04
  • $\begingroup$ For a put it is indeed enough to just check exercise after the dividend payment. It should be easy to check also. $\endgroup$
    – Quantuple
    Aug 10, 2016 at 18:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.