If we test the CAPM using Fama-MacBeth regressions we do the following:

First, run cross-sectional regressions to determine the beta loading

$$ R^i_t- r^f_t = a_i +\beta_i (R^M_t- r^f_t) + \epsilon_t^i$$

Afterwards, we determin the market price of risk for each $t$ and calculate the model errors

$$ R^i_t- r^f_t = \hat{\beta}_i \lambda^M_t + u_t^i \quad (1) \\ \alpha_{i,t} = R^i_t- r^f_t - \hat{\beta}_i \lambda^M_t$$ Then we can test if the $\bar{\alpha}_i = mean(\alpha_{i,t})$ are jointly zero or not using certain test statistics.


I want to understand choice of regression model in equation $(1)$. Why don't we use the following $$ R^i_t- r^f_t = \alpha_i + \hat{\beta}_i \lambda^M_t + u_t^i \quad (2) $$ and test if the $\alpha_i$ are jointly zero?

The only difference between $(1)$ and $(2)$ is the inclusion of $\alpha$ into the $\lambda_t^M$ estimation. For both approaches it is possible to come up with simple test statistics. So both approaches can be used equally easy.

  • $\begingroup$ "The only difference between (1) and (2) is the inclusion of α into the β estimation". I don't understand this statement. In both (1) and (2) $\hat{\beta}$ is fixed, it is not being estimated, it came out of the time series regressions of the first part. $\endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Commented Oct 16, 2016 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ I mixed up $\lambda$ and $\beta$ $\endgroup$
    – Phun
    Commented Oct 16, 2016 at 17:56


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.