0
$\begingroup$

Background Information:

An Inconsistent pricing strategy is a self financing strategy $\phi$ with $V_T(\phi)= 0$ and $V_0(\phi) \neq 0$

A strong arbitrage is a self-financing strategy $\phi$ with $V_0(\phi) = 0$ and $V_T(\phi) > 0$

Question:

Suppose there exists an Inconsistent pricing strategy. Prove from the definition that there must exist a strong arbitrage.

Attempted proof - Let $\phi$ be a self-financing strategy such that $V_0(\phi)\neq 0$ and $V_T(\phi) = 0$.

I am confused how this is possible to prove seems like we have a direct contradiction. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

We assume that $V_0(\phi)<0$; otherwise, we can consider the strategy $-\phi$. Then, we buy extra $-V_0(\phi)/S_0^0$ share of the risk-free asset $S^0$, from the $k+1$ assets $S^0, S^1,\ldots, S^k$, which is the deposit or money-market account, and hold until maturity $T$, that is, we consider the trading strategy $\psi$, where \begin{align*} \psi_i = \begin{cases} -V_0(\phi)/S_0^0, & \text{ if } i=0,\\ 0, & \text{ otherwise}, \end{cases} \end{align*} without any intermediate adjustment. It is then clear that $V_0(\psi+\phi)=0$, and $V_T(\psi+\phi)>0$. In other words, there exists a strong arbitrage strategy (e.g., $\psi+\phi$).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.