I am trying to understand the transformation of the Black-Scholes equation to the one-dimensional heat equation from Joshi, M. (2011). The Concepts and practice of mathematical finance. 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, pp.119. . The author stated that the Black-Scholes equation:

$ \frac{\partial C}{\partial t}(S,t) +rS \frac{\partial C}{\partial S}(S,t) + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 S^2 \frac{\partial^2 C}{\partial S^2}(S,t) -rC=0 $

can be rewritten as:

$ \frac{\partial C}{\partial t}(S,t) +(r-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2) S \frac{\partial C}{\partial S}(S,t) + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 (S \frac{\partial}{\partial S})^2 C -rC=0 $,

however I can't see how these two equations are equivalent, in particular, I don't understand how the additional $-\frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 S \frac{\partial C}{\partial S} (S,t)$ came about. I have tried expanding the squared differential operator as follows:

\begin{align*} & \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2(S \frac{\partial}{\partial S})^2 C(S,t) \\ &= \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \frac{\partial}{\partial S} [\frac{\partial}{\partial S} (S^2 C(S,t))] \\ &= \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \frac{\partial}{\partial S} [2S\cdot C(S,t) + S^2 \frac{\partial C(S,t)}{\partial S}] \\ &= \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 [2C(S,t) + 2S \frac{\partial C(S,t)}{\partial S} + 2S \frac{\partial C(S,t)}{\partial S} + S^2 \frac{\partial^2 C(S,t)}{\partial S^2} \\ &= \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 [2C(S,t) + 4S \frac{\partial C(S,t)}{\partial S}] + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 S^2 \frac{\partial ^2 C(S,t)}{\partial S^2} \end{align*}

Is there something that I missed out? Can anyone help me out?


  • $\begingroup$ A warm welcome to Quant.SE and thank you for your question $\endgroup$ – vonjd Jan 8 '17 at 9:35

I think you've cottoned on to the main question - that is,to see why $\frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 S^2 \frac{\partial^2 C}{ \partial S^2 }$ is the same thing as $-\frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 S \frac{\partial C}{\partial S} + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 (S \frac{\partial}{\partial S})^2 C $. I think your confusion comes from dealing with the squared operator.

Writing down what the expression means, we have

$$ (S \frac{\partial}{\partial S})^2 C= (S \frac{\partial}{\partial S}) (S \frac{\partial}{\partial S}) C $$

That is, apply $S \frac{\partial}{ \partial S} $ to $C$ first, then apply $S \frac{\partial}{\partial S}$ to the result. Note that we can't just switch the order of these symbols - this is not the same thing as $\frac{\partial}{\partial S} \frac{\partial}{\partial S} S^2 $. (The derivative operator rarely commutes with anything - try evaluating this on a hypothetical option with constant value $C=1$) Expanding out the expression should give

$$ (S \frac{\partial}{\partial S})^2 C = S \frac{\partial}{\partial S} (S \frac{\partial C}{\partial S}) $$

and applying the product rule gives that this is equal to

$$ S (\frac{\partial S}{\partial S} \frac{\partial C}{\partial S} + S \frac{\partial ^2 C}{\partial S ^2}) $$

(Incidentally, we can see that it's exactly the product rule that makes the derivative fail to commute with multiplication by $S$). So

$$ (S \frac{\partial}{\partial S})^2 C= S \frac{\partial C}{\partial S} + S^2 \frac{\partial ^2 C}{\partial S ^2} $$

Multiply this by $\frac{1}{2} \sigma^2$ and rearrange a little and we should have our result.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.