Following Brigo$^1$ p.77, we can decompose the price of a swaption as a sum of Zero-Coupon bond options (Jamshidian's Trick).

To do so, the authors suggest to find $r^*$ the value of the spot rate at $t$ for which $ \sum_{i=1}^n c_i P(t,T_i, r*)= 1$

As an example they show this for the Vasicek Model, where $A()$ and $B()$ give the analytical ZCB Prices.

$ \sum_{i=1}^n c_i A(t,T_i) e^{-B(t,T_i)r*} = 1$

Assume we have a short-rate model for which we do not have an analytical expression for the ZCB prices (e.g. Exponential Vasicek), how can we still find the value of $r^*$?

See another $^2$ step-by-step explanation on the problem

1) http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-540-34604-3

2) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers2.cfm?abstract_id=2246054

  • $\begingroup$ If you do not have an analytical bond price formula, you won't be able to find $r^*$ specifically, though you may be able to show the existence if the bond price $P(t, T)$ is a monotonic function of $r_t$ for any $T\ge t$. $\endgroup$ – Gordon Jan 27 '17 at 15:56
  • $\begingroup$ @Gordon Does that help if I do simulations to find out the optimal value? $\endgroup$ – SmallChess Jan 28 '17 at 4:15
  • $\begingroup$ are there any numerical implications/advantages for this trick? is it performant to price/risk a series of options using analytic formulae rather than doing a bump and reval on the portfolio? are there any studies on this aspect? thank you $\endgroup$ – satishv Jul 1 '18 at 13:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.