0
$\begingroup$

suppose $$dA = \mu Adt + \sigma AdX.$$ is a geometric Brownian motion. One says that the Probability $P(A,t)$ of $A$ reashing the critical level $K(t)$ before maturity: $$\dfrac{\partial P}{\partial t} + \dfrac{1}{2}\sigma^2A^2\dfrac{\partial^2 P}{\partial A^2}+\mu \dfrac{\partial P}{\partial A} = 0$$ I know this is the Kolomogorov backward equation for transition density, but why this is true for probability function here? It seems we should replace CDF by PDF i.e replace $P$ by $\dfrac{\partial P}{\partial x}$?

Actually the background is the probability of default, Paul Wilmott on Quantitative Finance Volumne II Page641 39.2.2 enter image description here

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ @Quantuple sorry, here is $P(A\geq K(t))$ $\endgroup$
    – A.Oreo
    Commented Feb 13, 2017 at 15:12
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, now this makes more sense :) Then you could equivalently see that equation as the pricing PDE for a digital option. $\endgroup$
    – Quantuple
    Commented Feb 13, 2017 at 15:19
  • $\begingroup$ the price PDE of digital option is same as the black-schole equation, how does a probability become this form? $\endgroup$
    – A.Oreo
    Commented Feb 14, 2017 at 1:23
  • $\begingroup$ Because your $P(a, t)$ is actually $Q(A_T > K \mid A_t = a) = \Bbb{E}^\Bbb{Q}[ 1\{ A_T > K \} \mid A_t = a]$. Which can be seen as the undiscounted price of a digital option. The discounted price should verify the usual pricing PDE since it should emerge as a $\Bbb{Q}$-martingale (Feynman-Kac formula). $\endgroup$
    – Quantuple
    Commented Feb 14, 2017 at 6:37
  • $\begingroup$ If I did not interpret your $P(A,t)$ correctly would you please insert a copy of the page 641 you refer to since I do not own that book. $\endgroup$
    – Quantuple
    Commented Feb 14, 2017 at 8:41

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.