0
$\begingroup$

I just read the following and i am having some difficulty to interpret it:

We begin our analysis in the standard Black-Scholes world consisting of a bank account process of price denoted by $B_t$, and a risky stock process $S_t$, both defined on a filtered probability space $(0, \mathbb{F}, \mathfrak{F}_t, \mathbb{P})$, with the filtration $\mathfrak{F}_t$ generated by the standard Brownian motion $W_t$. Both asset processes are therefore adapted to the filtration $\mathfrak{F}_t$, with local dynamics shown below \begin{eqnarray} \mathrm{d}S_t & = & \mu S_t \mathrm{d}t + \sigma S_t \mathrm{d}W_t,\\ \mathrm{d}B_t & = & r B_t \mathrm{d}t. \end{eqnarray}

The problem is the last sentence in connection with the two equations?

Update: How is $B_t$ adapted to the same filtration $\mathfrak{F}_t$ as $S_t$ since $B_t$ is not driven by any Brownian motion?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Could you please detail your question: which part of the last sentence? $\endgroup$ – lehalle Feb 15 '17 at 23:48
  • $\begingroup$ "adapted to the filtration with local dynamics" $\endgroup$ – user10777 Feb 16 '17 at 11:12
2
$\begingroup$

I am not sure I understand your question. If not - then please clarify.

  1. The process for $S$ follows from the Black-Scholes assumption of the risky asset price following a constant coefficient geometric Brownian motion.

  2. The process for $B$ follows from the instantaneous interest rate being constant.

  3. The process being adapted to the filtration $\left( \mathfrak{F}_t \right)_{t \in \mathbb{R}_+}$ simply means that for every $t \in \mathbb{R}_+$, the random variable $S_t$ is $\mathfrak{F}_t$-measurable. Think of this as the information in $\mathfrak{F}_t$ being sufficient to determine the value of $S_t$. Further think of the natural filtration $\mathfrak{F}_t$ of the Brownian motion $W$ as containing all the information of observing $W$ up until time $t$. Given that the process $S$ has only one driving source of uncertainty $W$, it follows that knowing the path of $W$ up to time $t$ is sufficient to determine the path of $S$ up to that time. Consequently, $S$ is adapted to the natural filtration generated by $W$.

Answer to your update:

As Quantuple remarked, the non-random process $B$ is adapted to any filtration. You don't need to know anything about the path of $W$ in order to know the value of $B_t$ for any $t \in \mathbb{R}_+$. I.e., even the information in $\mathfrak{F}_0$ (the trivial sigma-algebra) is sufficient to determine $B_t$. Since $\mathfrak{F}_0 \subseteq \mathfrak{F}_t$ it follows that $B$ is adapted.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ +1. As far as $B_t$ is concerned it is a bit of a tautology to say that it is adapted since it is a deterministic process: you can measure it even without the knowledge of $\mathfrak{F}_t$ at $t$ $\endgroup$ – Quantuple Feb 16 '17 at 8:18
  • $\begingroup$ Good point @Quantuple. $\endgroup$ – LocalVolatility Feb 16 '17 at 8:24
  • $\begingroup$ so Ft is a function of W and St is a function of Ft? $\endgroup$ – user10777 Feb 16 '17 at 11:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ft includes all possible information about W for all times up to t, and St is a function only of that information, yes. $\endgroup$ – noob2 Feb 16 '17 at 14:07
  • $\begingroup$ Extending on @noob2 comment: $\mathfrak{F}_t$ is not a function but a collection of subsets of $\mathbb{F}$. I suggest you to read a gentle introduction, such as Shreve's "Stochastic Calculus for Finance II". $\endgroup$ – LocalVolatility Feb 16 '17 at 14:17
1
$\begingroup$

Your problem seems to lie in the fundamentals of stochastic processes, so you should probalby refresh your knowledge in this field.

Every process, also $W_t$ comes with a "natural" filtration $\mathfrak{F}_t$. It's the minimal (in a certain sense) filtration for which the process is adapted. Adapted means for a process $X_t$ that for every $t$, $X_t$ is measurable on $\mathfrak{F_t}$.

Now to your sentence in question: With the Ito calculus, under certain conditions (basically the stochastic integrals have to be well defined and itos lemma has to hold), you can also "define" a process using its dynamics (also called Ito processes). Thats what the autor does for $S_t$ and $B_t$. Also, the result is an adapted process.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.