It is known that if the numeraire is the bank account, then the martingale measure is determined by the fact that every asset has $r$ as its local rate of return.

However, the local rate of return is the "multiplier" of the stock price in the dt-term of the SDE. That is, if $$dS_t = S_t\alpha dt + S_t\sigma dW$$ then $\alpha$ is the local rate of return, which must be equal to $r$ under the martingale measure.

However, imagine if under the $P$-measure, $S_t$ satisfied the SDE$$dS_t = \alpha dt + \sigma dW,$$ in this case, what is the equivalent martingale measure requirement?


Let $B_t$ denote the $t$-value of a riskless money market account in which 1 unit of currency has been invested at time $t=0$. We have $B_t = e^{rt}$, where $B_t$ solves $$dB_t = B_trdt,\quad B_0=1 \tag{0} $$

If $S_t$ represents the $t$-value of a tradable asset, then in the absence of arbitrage opportunity we must have that (fundamental theorem of asset pricing): $$ \frac{S_t}{B_t} \text{ is a } \Bbb{Q} \text{-martingale} $$ in other words \begin{align} d\left(\frac{S_t}{B_t}\right) &= \frac{dS_t}{B_t} - \frac{S_t}{B_t^2} dB_t + 0 \tag{Itô} \\ &= \frac{1}{B_t} \left( dS_t - S_t r dt \right) \tag{using $(0)$} \\ &= \dots dW_t^\Bbb{Q} \tag{1} \end{align} by the martingale representation theorem.

Note that for $(1)$ to hold it is necessary to have: $$ dS_t = \color{blue}{rS_t} dt + \dots dW_t^\Bbb{Q} $$ This is the equivalent martingale measure requirement you're looking for.

Now, to reach that $rS_t$ drift under $\Bbb{Q}$, you shall not use the same Girsanov kernel depending on whether $S_t$ follows a GBM or an ABM under $\Bbb{P}$ but that's another question.

In the first case you'll have: $$dS_t = \alpha S_t dt + \sigma S_t dW_t^\Bbb{P} \to dS_t = \color{blue}{rS_t} dt + \sigma S_t dW_t^\Bbb{Q} $$ with $$\left. \frac{d\Bbb{Q}}{d\Bbb{P}} \right\vert_{\mathcal{F}_t} = \mathcal{E}\left[ -\lambda W_t^\Bbb{P}\right], \quad \lambda=\frac{\alpha-r}{\sigma}$$ In the second: $$dS_t = \alpha dt + \sigma dW_t^\Bbb{P} \to dS_t = \color{blue}{rS_t} dt + \sigma dW_t^\Bbb{Q} $$ with $$\left. \frac{d\Bbb{Q}}{d\Bbb{P}} \right\vert_{\mathcal{F}_t} = \mathcal{E}\left[ -\lambda W_t^\Bbb{P}\right], \quad \lambda=\frac{\alpha-rS_t}{\sigma}$$ See this paper if you want more mathematical details.

  • $\begingroup$ +1 Nice answer. Indeed, to be a martingale, under the risk-neutral measure, the drift term has to be of the form $rS_t$. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    Feb 24 '17 at 15:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.