1
$\begingroup$

I understand the author's intended solution to the below problem, but I thought I would see if I could solve this using first principles and Ito's Lemma instead for practice.

Let $V(S(t), t) = e^{rt}\ln{[S(t)]}$. Then

\begin{align*}V_S &= \frac{e^{rt}}{S(t)},\\ V_{SS} &= \frac{-e^{rt}}{[S(t)]^2} \text{, and}\\ V_t &= re^{rt}\ln[S(t)].\end{align*}

Assuming the Black-Scholes framework, $dS(t) = (\alpha - \delta)S(t) dt + \sigma S(t) dZ(t)$. By Ito's Lemma,

\begin{align*}dV &= (\alpha - \delta)e^{rt} dt +e^{rt}\sigma dZ(t) - \frac{1}{2}e^{rt}\sigma^2 dt + re^{rt}\ln[S(t)]dt\\ &=[(\alpha - \delta)e^{rt} - 0.5e^{rt}\sigma^2 + re^{rt}\ln[S(t)]dt + e^{rt}\sigma dZ(t).\end{align*}

It would appear that without knowing anything about $\delta$ or $\sigma$, we have no where to go. So is there not a way to solve this problem from first principles without knowing that since the Sharpe ratios of the asset and the derivative are perfectly (positively) correlated, they are equal? I.e.,

$$\frac{\gamma_V - r}{\sigma_V} = \frac{\gamma - r}{\Omega_V\sigma} = \frac{\alpha - r}{\sigma},$$

where $\gamma_V$ is the continuously compounded return on the derivative and $\Omega_V$ is the elasticity of the derivative.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Assume that under the real world measure $$ dS_t/S_t = (\alpha-\delta) dt + \sigma dZ_t^\Bbb{P} \tag{1} $$ Under the EMM $\Bbb{Q}$ one then needs to have (fundamental theorem of asset pricing: in the absence of arbitrage the discounted value of any self-financing portfolio should be a martingale): $$ dS_t/S_t = (r-\delta) dt + \sigma dZ_t^\Bbb{Q} \tag{2} $$ Examining $(1)$ and $(2)$ the (instantaneous) excess return per unit of volatility risk is therefore: $$ \pi_S = \frac{\alpha-\delta}{\sigma} - \frac{r-\delta}{\sigma} := \frac{\alpha-r}{\sigma} $$


Now assume $V(t,S_t) = e^{rt} \ln(S_t)$. As you noted, applying Itô's lemma yields: $$ dV_t = e^{rt}\left[ r\ln(S_t) dt + \frac{dS_t}{S_t} - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 dt \right] \tag{3} $$ Writing $dV_t$ under real world and risk-neutral measures respectively plugging $(1)$ and $(2)$ then gives: $$ dV_t = e^{rt}\left[ (\alpha-\delta) + r\ln(S_t) - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right] dt + e^{rt} \sigma dZ_t^\Bbb{P} \tag{4} $$ $$ dV_t = e^{rt}\left[ (r-\delta) + r\ln(S_t) - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right] dt + e^{rt} \sigma dZ_t^\Bbb{Q} \tag{5} $$ The (instantaneous) excess return per unit of volatility risk is now: $$ \pi_V = \frac{e^{rt}\left((\alpha-\delta) + r\ln(S_t) - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right)}{e^{rt}\sigma} - \frac{e^{rt}\left( (r-\delta) + r\ln(S_t) - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right)}{e^{rt}\sigma} := \frac{\alpha-r}{\sigma} = \pi_S $$ So you see that you fall back on the result that the Sharpe ratios are the same without any prior knowledge.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.