4
$\begingroup$

let's assume that interest rates are constant, $r$. When $r\geq 0$, we can see that if $T_1<T_2$ and $C_1$ (resp. $C_2$) is the price of a call option on a non-dividend paying stock with maturity $T_1$ (resp. $T_2$), then $C_1<C_2$.

I am trying to understand what happens when $r<0$. But all I have are the optimal bounds $S_0-KB_i < C_i < S_0$, where $K$ is the strike price and $B_i=e^{-rT_i}$. I can't seem to deduce any consequences from this alone.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am wondering the purpose of investment if the interest rate is negative. $\endgroup$ – Gordon Jan 17 '18 at 19:19
  • $\begingroup$ @gordon: the only alternative is holding physical cash which is difficult in large quantities ! $\endgroup$ – dm63 Jan 18 '18 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @dm63. I think the financial theory should be redefined in this case, as usually we assume that we borrow money to buy the stock. $\endgroup$ – Gordon Jan 18 '18 at 14:16
  • $\begingroup$ Hopefully the Fed will hike rates more and we won't have to do that $\endgroup$ – dm63 Jan 18 '18 at 14:37
1
$\begingroup$

the short answer: we have $C_1 \leq C_2$ for all $r \in \Bbb R$. Here it is important to note that $C_1$ and $C_2$ have the same discounted strike, i.e. $C_1$ has strike $K_1 := K \cdot \exp(rT_1)$ and $C_2$ has strike $K_2 := K \cdot \exp(rT_2)$

The longer answer: one way to reason why option prices are increasing with maturity is the fact that the discounted underlying is a martingale (with respect to the pricing measure) and the fact that the function $x \mapsto (x-K)^+$ is convex. To be more precise let's fix a strike $K \in \Bbb R$ and denote the time-$T$ price of the underlying by $S_T$.
Then the process $\{\exp(-rT)S_T\}_{T \geq 0}$ is a martingale. A well known result (which is a simple application of Jensen's formula) states that the process $\{(\exp(-rT)S_T - K)^+\}_{T \geq 0}$ is a submartingale. In particular, submartingales have increasing expectations which implies \begin{align} C_1 = & \exp(-rT_1) \cdot \Bbb E \Bigl[\Bigl(S_{T_1} - K \cdot \exp(rT_1) \Bigr)^+ \Bigr] = \Bbb E \Bigl[\Bigl(\exp(-rT_1)S_{T_1} - K \Bigr)^+ \Bigr] \\ \leq & \Bbb E \Bigl[\Bigl(\exp(-rT_2)S_{T_2} - K \Bigr)^+ \Bigr] = \exp(-rT_2) \cdot \Bbb E \Bigl[\Bigl(S_{T_2} - K \cdot \exp(rT_2) \Bigr)^+ \Bigr] = C_2. \end{align}

Note that I did not assume any model or particular distribution for $S$, so this result for 'every' model.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.