-3
$\begingroup$

I would like to solve (as mathematically and formally as possible) that the following Markowitz problems are equivalent. The big point is: I want to show that it is equivalent to constrain the return of the portfolio to be greater than $m$ or equal to $m$.

Formulation I enter image description here

Formulation II enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I guess it amounts to saying that you want to exclude the case when the optimal portfolio $w_*$ is such that $\mu'w_{*}>m$. Notice that, given that $\Sigma$ is positive definite, you can choose another portfolio $w_{**}=w_{*}-1\epsilon$, with $\epsilon>0$ and small enough, such that $\mu'w_{**}=\mu'w_* - \mu'1\epsilon>m$, but clearly $w_{**} {'}\Sigma w_{**}=w_{*} {'}\Sigma w_{*} - 1{'}\Sigma 1 \epsilon <w_{*} {'}\Sigma w_{*}$, because $1{'}\Sigma 1>0$. This contradicts the optimality of $w_*$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.