4
$\begingroup$

If the pricing function $F$ satisfies the black scholes PDE, then I can obtain risk-neutral evaluation formula from Feynman-Kac.

If I already have the risk-neutral evaluation formula, can I still use Feynman Kac to obtain the Black Scholes PDE?

I..e, is there a converse to Feynman-Kac?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

If you assume that $$ V_t = V(t,S_t;\theta) = \Bbb{E}^\Bbb{Q} \left[ e^{-\int_t^T r(s) ds} V_T \mid \mathcal{F}_t \right] $$ with $V_T = h(S_T;\theta), \Bbb{Q}-\text{a.s.}$ along with $$ dS_t/S_t = r(t) dt + \sigma W_t^\Bbb{Q} $$ then this equivalently means that $$ \frac{V_t}{B_t} = \Bbb{E}^\Bbb{Q} \left[ \frac{V_T}{B_T} \mid \mathcal{F}_t \right] \tag{1} $$ where we have defined $B_t = e^{\int_0^t r(s) ds}$ (let's assume $r(t)$ is deterministic in what follows without loss of generality), which is the mathematical representation of the fact that $V_t/B_t$ is a $\Bbb{Q}$-martingale.

Hence by the martingale representation theorem we should have that (pure diffusion assumed) \begin{align} d\left(\frac{V_t}{B_t}\right) = f(.) dW_t^\Bbb{Q} \end{align} for some well-behaved function $f$.

Computing the differential on the LHS using the information at hand and Itô calculus leads to ($B_t$ has finite variation) \begin{align} d\left(\frac{V_t}{B_t}\right) &= \frac{dV_t}{B_t} - \frac{V_t}{B_t^2}dB_t + 0 \,d\langle V \rangle_t + 2 \frac{V_t}{B_t^3} \underbrace{d\langle B \rangle_t}_{0} - \frac{1}{B_t^2} \underbrace{d\langle V, B \rangle_t}_{0} \\ &= \frac{1}{B_t} \left( dV_t - V_t r(t) dt \right) \\ &= \frac{1}{B_t} \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial t} dt + \frac{\partial V}{\partial S} dS_t + \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial S^2} d\langle S \rangle_t - V r(t) dt \right) \\ &= \frac{1}{B_t} \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial V}{\partial S} r(t) S + \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial S^2} \sigma^2 S^2 - r(t) V \right) dt + \frac{1}{B_t} \frac{\partial V}{\partial S} \sigma S dW_t^\Bbb{Q} \end{align} hence requiring $$ \frac{\partial V}{\partial t}(t,S) + \frac{\partial V}{\partial S}(t,S) r(t) S + \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial S^2}(t,S) \sigma^2 S^2 - r(t) V = 0 $$ with $V(T,S_T) = h(S_T;\theta)$, which is precisely the pricing PDE.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Nice answer. I made a minor change to correct a sign error in the first equation. $\endgroup$ – LocalVolatility Apr 20 '17 at 16:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.