1
$\begingroup$

If you generate random stock price paths according to a GBM with daily increments, what will be the distribution of the realized volatility? Assume that the realized volatility is measured over daily increments for the whole year.

I assume that the realized volatility is an unbiased estimator of the parameter sigma in the GBM, but I've never seen it proved. As for the higher moments, what can be said ?

| improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is GBM stands for Generalized Brownian Motion and you assume that $\sigma$ is not constant? $\endgroup$ – zer0hedge May 2 '17 at 12:27
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The realized variance will have a Chi-Squared distribution, centered around the (constant) true variance used in the MonteCarlo simulation. A realized variance calculated from N non-overlapping observations will be Chi-Squar with N d.o.f. $\endgroup$ – noob2 May 2 '17 at 14:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @noob2 - I think it is N-1 degrees of freedom, but otherwise spot on because of the non-overlapping (independent) increments of equal time length. $\endgroup$ – FinanceGuyThatCantCode May 2 '17 at 20:05
-1
$\begingroup$

I assume the OP means what is the variance, across N paths of M steps each, of the realised volatility of the GBM.

You would imagine that it is related to the dt-step size implied by M. i.e. for lower M, the variance of the pathwise-estimated volatility increases.

Feels like is related to strike adjustments for variance swaps with discrete observations, not sure if there is literature out for that but worth googling

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.