1
$\begingroup$

While searching around for some market making-related stuff I bumped into this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3115 and thought that I'll start digging through it and its References, out of lack of better ideas. I doubt that's a particularly effective way of approaching this, so could someone give me a better list of papers to get started with? I'm particularly interested in the theory of market making strategies for stocks, but will happily read any "classical" works in the general "quant finance" area.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The original Black-Scholes paper? $\endgroup$ – SmallChess May 15 '17 at 6:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Many books are mentioned on these pages, did you sample them? The topic is quite broad and what is good depends on opinion so this question is not a great fit to the format... $\endgroup$ – Bob Jansen May 15 '17 at 7:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you have a doctorate and in what area of mathematics? $\endgroup$ – Dave Harris May 15 '17 at 17:11
  • $\begingroup$ @DaveHarris No PhD yet, I'm in the process of getting Msc in theoretical mathematics currently $\endgroup$ – user1633011 May 15 '17 at 21:40
5
$\begingroup$

The field is in flux right now. Since you are at the master's level I think you should focus on more general works in mathematics. If you were my student and we were ignoring specific things such as securities analysis and accounting and focusing on the mathematics, I would recommend you begin with measure theory, real analysis, combinatorics, Bayesian analysis and decision theory (both Bayesian and Frequentist). It's important to understand that a lot of stuff used in quantitative finance lacks empirical support. Think of other categories of problems such as the difference between two means.

Depending on your precise assumptions there are only a few possible tools and only two or three should be operative at a time, one Bayesian, one Frequentist and one Likelihoodist if it differs from the Frequentist. Once you have selected your interpretation of probability, there should only be one choice open to you.

In quantitative finance, there are tons of tools and each one is being proposed because it is not clear what to use. Tools range from OLS to GARCH, to fractal based analysis, neural networks to data envelope analysis to random forests and you can get a long list in the literature. In just one category I did a review on I found 26 techniques.

You want to stay out of the weeds AND stay out of most of the foundational documents. To understand why you need to stay out of the weeds consider that GARCH is big right now, but in the very first GARCH article they ran a test on stocks and found that stocks strongly violated the assumptions necessary for GARCH to work. Even though it is not supportable, neither are most things, so why not use it?

Go to one of your advisors or to a librarian in your academic library and start with a book on measure theory. I am not going to recommend one, but instead, suggest you talk to people about it where you are at. There is an advantage to face-to-face conversation. Then pick up real analysis. You can flip the order. As you start getting into this you will find that many of these problems are really combinatoric problems. Lots of the solutions really attempt to go around the combinatoric issues. Then I would pick up an introductory book on Bayesian methods and an introductory book on decision theory.

As you get into the field you will find someone needs you to evaluate a neural network or an ARMA model. I recommend the physicians' command "first do no harm." You are an expert in the math and not in finance or economics. Listen to them, dig deep into what they are really needing from you and what their goals are. Be as good as you can at the base math, then build into finance later.

PS It wouldn't hurt you to pick up an accounting textbook either.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What you mean by the field is in flux right now??? $\endgroup$ – Permian Jun 22 '18 at 11:43
  • $\begingroup$ I could, in finance, data science, or economics write you five different and non-overlapping curricula about how you are to do your job in quantitative finance. Further, I could walk into five different broker-dealers and find very different views of what the "correct" methodology is. In fact, I can find diversity often inside a house. Some things, like Fama-French, clearly don't work, but they are heavily used because the people who use them don't have a logical alternative within their existing training. This leads to intrinsic instability and fashion based solutions. $\endgroup$ – Dave Harris Jun 22 '18 at 21:27
  • $\begingroup$ hasnt quant finance always been in flux then? $\endgroup$ – Permian Jun 22 '18 at 21:47
  • $\begingroup$ @Permian not really, although, yes for a very long time. $\endgroup$ – Dave Harris Jun 22 '18 at 21:49
2
$\begingroup$

I would consider "Aspect of Mathematical Finance" as a starting point for a "general quant finance area". It is

A collection of essays written by leading experts in the field of finance mathematics

For "market making-related stuff" I would try "Market Microstructure in Practice"

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.