I'm currently reading a paper (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2543702) which uses the following process to describe the dynamics of a firm's asset value:

\begin{equation} V_t = V_0e^{X_t},\quad\text{where } X_t = \bigg(r - \delta - \frac{\sigma^2}{2} - \lambda \xi \Bigg)t + \sigma W_t + \sum_{k=1}^{N_t}Y_k. \end{equation}

The parameters $r$, $\delta$, $\sigma$, $\lambda$ and $\xi$ are constants. $W$ is standard Brownian motion, $N$ is a Poisson process with constant intensity $\lambda>0$ and $Y$ is a sequence of i.i.d. random variables.

The author then goes on to derive the Laplace exponent of the process, which is the function $G(\cdot)$ defined by:

\begin{equation} \mathbb{E}\big[\text{exp}(\beta X_t)\big] = \text{exp}\big[G(\beta)t\big],\quad\beta \in \mathbb{R}. \end{equation}

I am able to derive the value of $G(\cdot)$. However, in the literature I have read, I have seen the Laplace exponent being used only when $X$ is a spectrally negative Levy process or a X is a subordinator. What guarantees the existence of the Laplace exponent for the process described above?

Many thanks



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.