0
$\begingroup$

I have been using the Carr-Madan method to price caplets using the FFT. I have followed every step closely and (i believe) successfully. I understand the procedure theoretically but I cannot interpret the complex nature of my results. Is the modulus my answer? Or is it the real part? Am I doing something wrong to have a complex number as my result?

https://wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/~ajacquie/IC_Num_Methods/IC_Num_Methods_Docs/Literature/CarrMadan.pdf

Thanks in advance

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you please cite the formula? If I remember correctly they end up with the real part only. First there is the integral from - infinity to + infinity, then you change variables, get the chf and the conjugate chf added which gives 2 times the real part. Then your result it not imaginary anymore. $\endgroup$
    – Richi Wa
    Commented Jul 3, 2017 at 20:23
  • $\begingroup$ wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/~ajacquie/IC_Num_Methods/… This is the paper. Do you need the formula for the characteristic function aswell? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 4, 2017 at 16:00
  • $\begingroup$ I've implemented this on my Github page github.com/phillyfan1138/FFTOptionPricing/blob/master/…. There is no complex output; your code must be wrong somewhere. $\endgroup$
    – user9403
    Commented Jul 4, 2017 at 22:19
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! I will try to check it out! Any chance you can tell me the model whose characteristic function you used? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 5, 2017 at 20:00
  • $\begingroup$ @SotirisZampelis please incorporate your link in your question $\endgroup$
    – SRKX
    Commented Jul 23, 2017 at 4:36

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

As I figured after reading Stephane Crepey's Financial Modelling book the result is meant to be complex, we should only include the real part as the answer something not 100% clear (at least to me) from Carr-Madan's paper.

I also found a useful outline of the algorithm for a naive version of FFT at F.Rouah's book on the Heston Model.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Bumping this because I'm coming across the same issue, but I've convinced myself that the imaginary part is just a numerical artifact (if someone who knows better can correct me I'd love to know!) $\endgroup$
    – Rylan
    Commented Jan 16 at 15:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.