Acerbi has several backtests for expected shortfall. The second backtest is based on this equality enter image description hereenter image description here

Does anybody know how to derive this equality? Can anybody explain, why it makes sense, especially dividing by $\alpha$?

Background: I took the equality from this presentation https://www.cass.city.ac.uk/faculty-and-research/faculties/finance/seminars-and-workshops/financial-engineering-workshops/ACERBI-Carlo-10.03.2015.pdf

This is how I know expected shortfall

enter image description here


Letting $X_t$ be a random variable, its conditional expectation with respect to some event $E$ is given by:

$$ \mathbb{E}^{\mathbb{P}}[X_t|E]=\frac{\mathbb{E}^{\mathbb{P}}[\mathbf{1}_EX_t]}{\mathbb{P}(E)}$$

In our case, Expected Shortfall is defined as:

$$ \text{ES}_{\alpha,t} = -\mathbb{E}^{\mathbb{P}}[X_t|X_t + \text{VaR}_{\alpha} < 0]$$


$$ \begin{align} \text{ES}_{\alpha,t} & = -\frac{\mathbb{E}^{\mathbb{P}}[\mathbf{1}_{\{X_t + \text{VaR}_{\alpha} < 0\}}X_t]}{\mathbb{P}(X_t + \text{VaR}_{\alpha} < 0)} \\[9pt] & = -\frac{\mathbb{E}^{\mathbb{P}}[\mathbf{1}_{\{X_t + \text{VaR}_{\alpha} < 0\}}X_t]}{\alpha} \\[11pt] & = -\mathbb{E}^{\mathbb{P}}\left[\frac{\mathbf{1}_{\{X_t + \text{VaR}_{\alpha} < 0\}}X_t}{\alpha}\right] \end{align} $$

Where the second step is a consequence of the definition of $\text{VaR}_{\alpha}.$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.