1
$\begingroup$

A few questions and my answers, to be sure I understand everything

Question 1

Suppose A and B agree on a forward contract: maturity

  • $T = 1Y$
  • spot at $t=0$: $S_0=100$
  • forward price $K = 120$.

Suppose B wants to sell this contract to C at $t = 6M$ (so that the contract will be between A and C). Suppose that $S_{6M}=135$, then C will buy the contract at 135-120=15 ?(so C buys the mark-to-market forward price)

Question 2

The value of a forward contract at $t$ = 0 equals

$$V_{0}=S_{0}-Kexp(-rT)$$

with $K=S_{0}exp(rT)$.

At $t = 6M$, the value is

$$V_t=S_t-Kexp(-r(T-t))=S_t-S_{0}exp(rT)exp(-r(T-t))=S_t-S_0exp(rt).$$

So again C will buy the contract at this price (?)

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ If there are no dividends and the risk-free rate $r$ is contant, your last equations are spot on although in that case $S_0 \exp(rt) \ne S_0 \exp(rT) = 120$, hence $V_t \ne 135-120=15$. Put differently, it costs nothing to set up a "fresh" forward contract between two parties here $A$ and $B$ ($V_0=0$ at $t=0$). But as time passes $0 < t \leq T$ the contract will gain/lose value, hence $B$ will either win/lose money when selling it to $C$ depending on the MTM of the contract at $t$ ($V_t \ne 0$ in general). Note that for $A$ nothing changes. $\endgroup$
    – Quantuple
    Commented Aug 10, 2017 at 13:17
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand your sentence: "Put differently [...] here A and B". Also, it seems that both reasoning are right. So C will buy the contract from B at which price ? The price given by Question 1 or 2 ? $\endgroup$
    – glork
    Commented Aug 10, 2017 at 17:01
  • $\begingroup$ See @Gordon complete answer sorry if I got you confused. $\endgroup$
    – Quantuple
    Commented Aug 10, 2017 at 17:04

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Assuming zero dividend and a constant interest rate $r$, the 1y forward price is then \begin{align*} 120 = K = S_0 e^r = 100\, e^r. \end{align*} Consequently, $e^r = 1.2$. The fair value of the forward contract, at 6M, is given by \begin{align*} e^{0.5 r} E\left(\frac{S_{1Y}-120}{e^{r}} \mid \mathcal{F}_{6M} \right) &= e^{0.5 r}\left(\frac{S_{6M}}{e^{0.5 r}} -\frac{120}{e^r}\right)\\ &= S_{6M} - 120 e^{-0.5 r}.\tag{1} \end{align*}

Then, for your Question 1, C is willing to buy the forward contract with the price 135-120 = 15, given that the value in $(1)$ is greater than 15.

For your second question, since \begin{align*} S_t - S_0 e^{rt} &= S_{6M} - S_0 e^{0.5r}\\ &= S_{6M} - S_0 e^r e^{-0.5r}\\ &=S_{6M}- 120 e^{-0.5 r}, \end{align*} C is indifferent for buying the forward contract with this price.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Q1: for me it's a bit weird. C should buy the contract to the FV no ?(If it was a call option: for me B will sell it to C at the fair value ie at $Call_t$.) Do you think C will make the calculus and compare the FV and the mark-to-market price ? Q2: what do you mean by " C is indifferent..." I'm still confused. To sum up, why do you need to compare ? Thanks $\endgroup$
    – glork
    Commented Aug 18, 2017 at 9:11
  • $\begingroup$ For Q1, as the value of the forward contract is strictly greater than 15, C is willing to buy at 15. For Q2, as the value of the forward contract is the same as the offering price, there is no immediate profit for C unless C needs to hedge, then it is indifferent. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    Commented Aug 18, 2017 at 12:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.