1
$\begingroup$

Scenario: I am trying to do a variation of the MV optimization for a portfolio. In this instance, I already have a vector of mean returns ($\mu$), a vector of ones, a covariance matrix ($\Sigma$), and $\phi^{-1}$ which is the inverse of the standard normal cumulative distribution function (function of probability alpha).

Problem: From the two equations stated below, I am going to input: $\mu$, $\Sigma$, 1 (vector of ones), $H$, and $\alpha$, and try to get a value for $\gamma$ (also, the ' represents the transpose of the vector).

Equations:

$$ H = w(\gamma)'\mu + \Phi^{−1}(α)[w(\gamma)' \Sigma w(γ)]^{1/2}$$ $$ w(\gamma) = \frac{1}{\gamma}\Sigma^{-1}\Big[\mu − \Big(\frac{\mathbf{1}' \Sigma^{-1} \mu-\gamma}{\mathbf{1}' \Sigma^{-1} \mathbf{1}}\Big) \mathbf{1}\Big]$$

What I already tried: I am trying to solve this system using a python solver. But I am not able to do it since the matrix multiplication apparently becomes non-convex.

Question: How to solve this problem?

Obs: This question comes from the article Portfolio Optimization with mental accounts from Sanjiv Das, Harry Markowitz, Jonathan Scheid, and Meir Statman, Equations (7) and (8). The article is found at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.410.8747&rep=rep1&type=pdf

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Starting with a value of $\gamma$, you can compute $w(\gamma)$ from the second equation and plug it into the RHS of the first equation and see what you get. If it does not match the desired $H$ you can try again with a different $\gamma$. This is what the article seems to suggest. Are you saying that this process does not work/fails to converge? $\endgroup$
    – nbbo2
    Sep 20, 2017 at 15:31
  • $\begingroup$ @noob2 Thanks for the comment. As the article states, specifying gamma with precision is not intuitive, so what I am trying to do is set up a optimization procedure that allows me to solve for it (given H and alpha). What you said is correct, I can just try values of gamma until I reach the desired result, but I don't know to to optimize that with a convex only solver. $\endgroup$
    – DGMS89
    Sep 21, 2017 at 13:58

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I will use a case in which I randomly generate both $\Sigma$ and $\mu$ randomly in 4 dimensions

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.stats import norm
from scipy.optimize import bisect

n = 4
np.random.seed(0)

S = np.random.uniform(0, 1, [n, n])
S = 0.5 * (S + S.transpose())
mu = np.random.uniform(-1, 1, n)

The trick with the transpose is just there to ensure that S is symmetric. I will choose $\alpha = 0.90$, and define the function $H$ as

Sinv = np.linalg.inv(S)
ones = np.ones_like(mu)

def H(gamma):

    # w
    w = (ones.dot(Sinv).dot(mu) - gamma) / (ones.dot(Sinv).dot(ones))
    w = Sinv.dot(mu - w) / gamma

    # H
    H = w.dot(mu) + norm.ppf(alpha) * np.sqrt(w.dot(S).dot(w))

    return H

This is a plot of $H = H(\gamma)$.

 g = np.linspace(4, 50, num = 500)
 h = np.array(map(H, g))
 i = h > 0
 plt.plot(g[i], h[i])
 plt.show()

enter image description here

The function is indeed sort of problematic for large values of $\gamma$ in the sense that any optimization algorithm (pretty much all of them) that uses derivatives will fail. But still you can use bisection to find the root

As an example I will use $H = 1.04$ (up in the flat region)

f = lambda x: H(np.exp(x)) - 1.04
r = bisect(f, 1.5, 6, xtol = 1e-12)
g0 = np.exp(r)
print g0, H(g0)

which generates the output

231.206991393 1.04

So the root is $\gamma = 231.20699$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Many thanks for the answer, this is exactly what I wanted. Just a couple of questions: how to you plot the graph you used in the answer? And for that graph, would it be possible to plot it only for H values above zero (since that is the return I want from the portfolio)? $\endgroup$
    – DGMS89
    Sep 27, 2017 at 15:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DGMS89 I modified the answer to take include the commands for plotting $H>0$ $\endgroup$
    – caverac
    Sep 27, 2017 at 16:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.