5
$\begingroup$

I tried using the brownian bridge approach to determine the probability $$P(S_t<\beta,t\in [0,T]|S_0,S_T)$$ where $S_t$ is a GBM in the usual Black Scholes setup. We know that for a BM $W_t$, $$P(W_t<\beta,t\in [0,T]|W_T=x)=1-\exp\bigg(-\frac{2}{T}\beta(\beta-x)\bigg)$$ and I then tried the following: since $$S_t=S_0e^{(\mu-1/2\sigma^2)t-\sigma W_t}$$we have $$\begin{aligned}&P(S_t<\beta,t\in [0,T]|S_0,S_T=s)\\&=P\bigg(W_t<\frac{\ln(\beta/S_0)-(\mu-1/2\sigma^2)t}{\sigma}\bigg|S_0,W_T=\frac{\ln(s/S_0)-(\mu-1/2\sigma^2)T}{\sigma}\bigg)\\&=1-\exp\bigg(-\frac{2}{T}\bigg(\frac{\ln(\beta/S_0)-(\mu-1/2\sigma^2)t}{\sigma}\bigg)\bigg(\frac{\ln(\beta/S_0)-\ln(s/S_0)}{\sigma}\bigg)\bigg)\\&=1-\exp\bigg(-\frac{2}{\sigma^2T}\bigg(\ln(\beta/S_0)-(\mu-1/2\sigma^2)t\bigg)\ln(\beta/s)\bigg)\end{aligned}$$ Evidently, the correct answer is just$$1-\exp\bigg(-\frac{2}{\sigma^2T}\ln(\beta/S_0)\ln(\beta/s)\bigg)$$ so I believe I'm almost there. What am I missing?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

In Inequality \begin{align*} W_t<\frac{\ln(\beta/S_0)-(\mu-1/2\sigma^2)t}{\sigma}, \end{align*} the right-hand side depends on $t$, you are not able to use the above result directly. In this case, a Girsanov transformation is usually employed.

Let $a= \frac{\mu-1/2\sigma^2}{\sigma}$, $b= \frac{\ln(\beta/S_0)}{\sigma}$, and $c= \frac{\ln(s/S_0)}{\sigma}$. We define the probability measure $\tilde{P}$ such that \begin{align*} \frac{d\tilde{P}}{dP}\big|_t = e^{-\frac{1}{2}a^2 t - aW_t}, \end{align*} where $P$ is the original probability measure. Then $\tilde{W}_t = W_t + at$ is a standard Brownian motion under $\tilde{P}$. Let $E$ and $\tilde{E}$ be expectations with respect to measures $P$ and $\tilde{P}$. Then, for any Borel set $A$, \begin{align*} &\ E\left(\pmb{1}_{\{W_t+at < b, t \in [0, T]\}} \pmb{1}_{\{W_T\in A\}} \right)\\ =&\ \tilde{E}\left(\left(\frac{d\tilde{P}}{dP}\big|_T \right)^{-1}\pmb{1}_{\{W_t+at < b, t \in [0, T]\}} \pmb{1}_{\{W_T\in A\}} \right)\\ =&\ \tilde{E}\left(e^{\frac{1}{2}a^2 T + aW_T}\pmb{1}_{\{W_t+at < b, t \in [0, T]\}} \pmb{1}_{\{W_T\in A\}} \right)\\ =&\ \tilde{E}\left(e^{-\frac{1}{2}a^2 T + a\tilde{W}_T}\pmb{1}_{\{\tilde{W}_t < b, t \in [0, T]\}} \pmb{1}_{\{\tilde{W}_T-aT\in A\}} \right)\\ =&\ \tilde{E}\left(e^{-\frac{1}{2}a^2 T + a\tilde{W}_T}\pmb{1}_{\{\tilde{W}_T-aT\in A\}}\tilde{E}\left(\pmb{1}_{\{\tilde{W}_t < b, t \in [0, T]\}} \,|\, \tilde{W}_T \right) \right)\\ =&\ \tilde{E}\left(e^{-\frac{1}{2}a^2 T + a\tilde{W}_T}\pmb{1}_{\{\tilde{W}_T-aT\in A\}}\left[1-\exp\Big(-\frac{2}{T}b(b-\tilde{W}_T)\Big) \right] \right)\\ =&\ E\left(\frac{d\tilde{P}}{dP}\big|_Te^{-\frac{1}{2}a^2 T + a\tilde{W}_T}\pmb{1}_{\{\tilde{W}_T-aT\in A\}}\left[1-\exp\Big(-\frac{2}{T}b(b-\tilde{W}_T)\Big) \right] \right)\\ =&\ E\left(\pmb{1}_{\{W_T\in A\}}\left[1-\exp\Big(-\frac{2}{T}b(b-W_T-aT)\Big) \right] \right). \end{align*} That is, \begin{align*} E\left(\pmb{1}_{\{W_t+at < b, t \in [0, T]\}} \,|\, W_T\right)&=1-\exp\Big(-\frac{2}{T}b(b-W_T-aT)\Big), \end{align*} or, equivalently, \begin{align*} E\left(\pmb{1}_{\{W_t+at < b, t \in [0, T]\}} \,|\, W_T=x\right)&=1-\exp\Big(-\frac{2}{T}b(b-x-aT)\Big). \end{align*} Therefore, \begin{align*} &\ P\bigg(W_t<\frac{\ln(\beta/S_0)-(\mu-1/2\sigma^2)t}{\sigma}, t \in[0, T]\,\Big|\,S_0,W_T=\frac{\ln(s/S_0)-(\mu-1/2\sigma^2)T}{\sigma}\bigg)\\ =&\ E\left(\pmb{1}_{\{W_t+at < b, t \in [0, T]\}} \,|\, W_T=c-aT\right)\\ =&\ 1-\exp\Big(-\frac{2}{T}b(b-c)\Big)\\ =&\ 1-\exp\Big(-\frac{2}{\sigma^2T}\ln(\beta/S_0)\ln(\beta/s)\Big). \end{align*}

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I knew I missed something, thank you very much. $\endgroup$
    – user128836
    Commented Sep 26, 2017 at 19:47
  • $\begingroup$ Above is written that we know that following statement is true: P(Wt<β,t∈[0,T]|WT=x)=1−exp(−2Tβ(β−x)). I am wondering how to proof it, can somebody show how to do it? $\endgroup$
    – user38559
    Commented Jan 28, 2019 at 19:33
  • $\begingroup$ See Corollary 3.7.4 of this book by Shreve. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    Commented Jan 28, 2019 at 20:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.