What is the difference between financial economics and finance? How does affect career options as well as academic opportunities?


closed as off-topic by LocalVolatility, noob2, Helin, amsh, Quantuple Oct 2 '17 at 8:54

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions seeking career advice are off-topic because this site is intended solely for questions about quantitative finance as defined by our scope." – LocalVolatility, Helin, amsh
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is actually a pretty subtle and subjective difference, IMHO. What exactly people mean by these two terms varies and is hard to pin down in general, without knowing the context. My take: Finance is an older and perhaps broader term, while most of the progress in finance in the last 50 years has come from people who considered themselves 'financial economists' (Fischer Black, Ross, Fama, Shiller, etc) and thought of themselves as 'the new wave' in finance. Today does the distinction still make sense? $\endgroup$ – noob2 Sep 29 '17 at 21:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ive been working in finance for 12 years now. To me, financial economics is research orientated (theoretical) and finance is trading orientated (practical). Both require completely different skillsets, and both also typically create different career paths. $\endgroup$ – Attack68 Oct 1 '17 at 19:34
  • $\begingroup$ If the section on career options is dropped, I'd argue asking for the difference between financial economics and finance is a legitimate question. $\endgroup$ – Matthew Gunn Oct 4 '17 at 2:08

Financial economics is what economics calls finance. Finance is what finance calls finance.

Less flippantly though, there's a long debate on whether finance is a subfield of economics, and this debate goes back at least to the PhD thesis of Markowitz. Prof. Milton Friedman famously opposed awarding Markowitz a PhD in economics from the University of Chicago for his portfolio theory because while Markowitz's work was brilliant, Friedman didn't consider it to be economics. I've heard Myron Scholes also express views that finance is to some extent distinct from economics.

Of course, you can find a huge range of views on whether finance is an economics subfield. Clearly much of the early work in finance was done by economists, and finance draws heavily from econometrics, time-series econometrics, and macroeconomics. On the other hand, risk-neutral pricing looks less like classic economics.

I'd personally argue there's some degree of economics claiming successful, related fields as its progeny. The mechanism design of Alvin Roth came out of operation research, but it's now been brought into economics.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.