I'm reading Pricing American Options using LU decomposition by Ikonen and Toivanen (IT).

They reference The valuation of American put options by Brennan and Schwartz, and cast it as method that uses LU decomposition to solve the linear complementarity problem (LCP) arising in the discretisation of the Black-Scholes "PDI" for American options.

On page 9, IT write:

"It is obvious that the use of the max-function in the backward substitution is possible because of the form of the solution of the option pricing problem."

Does this mean that the Brennan-Schwartz method of modified back substitution exactly the LCP exactly? If so, I don't think this is obvious. Is there a proof of it anywhere?

And on a related note, if Brennan-Schwartz solves the LCP exactly then why doesn't Wilmott use it in his "The Mathematics of Financial Derivatives"? He uses Projected Successive Over-relaxation (PSOR) exclusively, which is shown by IT to be a lot slower than using LU decomposition.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.