6
$\begingroup$

The Black Derman Toy model of interest rates is usually introduced as the model governed by the stochastic differential equation: $$d \ln r = \left[\theta(t) + \cfrac{\sigma'(t)}{\sigma(t)}\ln r \right]dt + \sigma(t) dz$$ However, originally the model was developed using binomial trees. The Black-Derman-Toy paper does not contain any differential equation. How does one show that the model constructed using binomial trees corresponds to the above differential equation in the continuous limit?

In a number of articles, for example the Black-Karasinski paper, the derivation is attributed to Hull and White's 1990 article "Pricing interest-rate derivative securities", but it does not give the derivation, only states it as a fact. I have looked into other papers of Hull and White available from John Hull's website, but did not find anything.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I asked the same question before, I can't deduce the relation between the drift and diffusion terms through the BDT tree method. But no one answered me. $\endgroup$ – A.Oreo Nov 1 '17 at 6:13
  • $\begingroup$ @A.Oreo: thanks for the comment. I am thinking of writing to John Hull. $\endgroup$ – auniket Nov 2 '17 at 18:50
  • $\begingroup$ Why don't you tweet Emanuel Derman? He is incredibly kind and generous. $\endgroup$ – Paul Portesi Nov 4 '17 at 3:33
4
+50
$\begingroup$

From the gentleman and scholar Emanuel Derman. Emanuel states "the last two pages answer the question asked".

https://www.dropbox.com/s/cg299qsbquuqdru/TwitterNotesOnBDT.2017.pdf?dl=0&m=

Please thank him directly on Twitter.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.