I have a simple question on the VaR for a portfolio that consists of a long and short position. Say I have a portfolio consisting of the following positions:

  • long 1000 shares of stock X

  • short 1000 shares of stock X

Let's assume the daily volatility for Apple stock is 2% and that the stock trades at 2 dollar/share so my investment is 4000 dollar in total. I want to calculate the VaR for each of the positions separately and for the full portfolio, but I am a little bit confused with the signs associated with long and short position. Intuitively, the portfolio should have VaR = 0 as the long and short position in the same stock with equal investment have a neutralizing effect.

(1) VaR for the long position VaR = 2%*2000*2.33 = 93.2

(2) VaR for the short position VaR = 2%*abs(-2000)*2.33 = 93.2

Now, for the combined position, my question is which signs to use? Do we say:

VaR = 2.33*sqrt((40)^2+(-40)^2+2*40*(-40)*corr) = 0 since corr = 1

VaR = 2.33*sqrt((40)^2+40^2+2*40*40*corr) = 0 since corr = -1

Since you have the same stock X, the correlation is simply equal to 1 or do we say it is equal to -1 because we have a short and long position in it? So generally my question is, do we take the absolut value if the position is short or?


  • 7
    $\begingroup$ If your portfolio consists 1000 long and 1000 short share of same stock, it means that value of your portfolio will always be zero. Question can make more sense if it is two different securities. $\endgroup$ – Neeraj Nov 21 '17 at 19:19

i_love_rain: I don´t think it should be negative. A negative Value at Risk should be a potential profit as stated here (or not exist at all): Why is Value at Risk non-negative?.

Seperately both positions have a positive VaR as stated by the OP. Both positions could lose money seperately, one when the share price rises, one when it falls.

The negative correlation as second option presented by the OP is right. If both positions were long (so it would be the same position anyway) the correlation would be 1. When one stock is long, the other short the correlation is -1.


I think VaR for the short position should be VaR = 2%*(-2000)*2.33 = -93.2


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.