Related: Dumb question: is risk-neutral pricing taking conditional expectation?

In the one-step binomial model...

For $\frac{d \mathbb Q}{d \mathbb P}$,

I think it's $\frac{d \mathbb Q}{d \mathbb P} = \frac{q_u}{p_u}1_u + \frac{q_d}{p_d}1_d$, so it's some asset with payoffs $\frac{q_u}{p_u}$ and $\frac{q_d}{p_d}$, expected value of 1 and replicating portfolio $(x,y)$ of

$$x=\frac{1}{1+R}\frac{u(\frac{q_d}{p_d})-d(\frac{q_u}{p_u})}{u-d}$$ $$y=\frac{1}{S_0}\frac{\frac{q_u}{p_u}-\frac{q_d}{p_d}}{u-d}$$

This seems to be some replicating portfolio that is expected to payoff 1 at $t=1$.

Question: Any intuition?

Well, $(x,y)=(\frac{1}{1+R},0)$ seems to give the same payoff but with -100% lower risk

For $X\frac{d \mathbb Q}{d \mathbb P}$,

we could say that the price of X uses not

$$E[X] = X_up_u+X_dp_d$$

but rather

$$E^{\mathbb Q}[X] = E[X\frac{d \mathbb Q}{d \mathbb P}] = X_u\frac{q_u}{p_u}p_u + \frac{q_d}{p_d}p_d$$

Question: So what's a '$X\frac{d \mathbb Q}{d \mathbb P}$'?

It pays $X_u\frac{q_u}{p_u}$ or $X_d\frac{q_d}{p_d}$ then replicating portfolio is...then idk. Not sure we need one since we're using real world probabilities anyhoo


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.