I understand that if I have a portfolio invested in stock A and options on stock A, the delta of my portfolio is going to be the weighted sum of the delta of the stock (=1) and of the option.

Now if I have a portfolio invested in stocks A and B and in options on these stocks, does it make sense to compute a global delta of the portfolio as the weighted sum of all the deltas? Or do we have to compute a delta that relates to A and a delta that relates to B?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What are you trying to achieve with this number ("portfolio delta")? $\endgroup$ – vonjd Jan 7 '18 at 9:18
  • $\begingroup$ Nothing, I just want to know if it still makes sense to talk about the delta of a portfolio when there are different stocks and options on these stocks in it. $\endgroup$ – astudentofmaths Jan 7 '18 at 16:24
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "sense"? Sense in what way? $\endgroup$ – vonjd Jan 7 '18 at 16:48
  • $\begingroup$ I think your question doesn't make sense as it stands. A better question would be about the delta of an option with different underlyings (e.g. a basket option). $\endgroup$ – vonjd Jan 7 '18 at 16:58
  • $\begingroup$ I believe you did not understand my question. If I have a portfolio with Z shares of A, W shares of B, X options on stock A and Y options on stock B, it does not make sense to talk about the delta of the portfolio right ? It makes sense to talk about the *delta of the portfolio related to A or related to B right ? $\endgroup$ – astudentofmaths Jan 7 '18 at 17:25

Strictly speaking, you cannot aggregate (i.e. sum) deltas. However, equity traders often provide their net exposure in currency units, which is a useful number. The same reasoning is possible with equity options: You can compute the 'delta equivalent position', i.e. delta times number of contracts (times multiplier) for each stock. Taking the delta equivalent position times the stock price gives you a hypothetical exposure in currency units, and adding these exposures up gives you a total exposure in currency units.


You can consider a multivariable delta if your security $V$ depends on two stocks $A$ and $B$: the gradient of $V$ is $$\nabla V=\left\langle \frac{\partial V}{\partial A}, \frac{\partial V}{\partial B}\right\rangle.$$ If you want a single number, there are indeed Greeks for multi-asset options.

  • $\begingroup$ I think this doesn't answer the question because the OP wanted to have a delta of an portfolio and not on a security which depends on a portfolio (see my comments above). Additionally: do you have a source for your definition of a multivariable delta? Also: could you give an example how to use that definition in practice? $\endgroup$ – vonjd Jan 8 '18 at 7:09
  • $\begingroup$ @vonjd One thing you could do in practice is use the well-known fact that the gradient points in the direction of greatest increase. So you can find out what relative changes in $A$ and $B$ will lead to greatest increase in $V$ (like, an increase of 5 dollars in $A$ for each 1 dollar increase in $B$). $\endgroup$ – Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen Jan 8 '18 at 7:42
  • $\begingroup$ @vonjd I should have mentioned that in my answer $V$ represents the total value of all stocks and options held. So $\partial V/\partial A$ is, by linearity of partial derivatives, a "weighted" sum of the deltas of the various assets. $\endgroup$ – Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen Jan 8 '18 at 7:55
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ A problem here is that the movements of different stocks are not independent (orthogonal). $\endgroup$ – noob2 Jan 8 '18 at 13:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.