2
$\begingroup$

I am currently reading about stocks with "high sensitivity to innovations in aggregate volatility". I am not a native speaker so this might be a trivial question, but I truly cannot find an answer anywhere on the internet. Ang, Xing and Zhang (2006) state that "stocks with high sensitivities to innovations in aggregate volatility have low average returns".

Currently I am reading it as follows: Stocks that are sensitive to market volatility developments/movements/changes have low average returns. Is this how I should interpret the sentence stated before? I have found a book online describing stochastic volatility, but it's all relatively new to me.

Many thanks!

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

A volatility innovation is the difference between our best prediction of future volatility and what is actually observed. Say that we predict the volatility at the next time step as $E_t[ \sigma_{t+1}] = \hat{\sigma}_{t+1}$, but instead observe $\sigma_{t+1} = \hat{\sigma}_{t+1} + \varepsilon_{t+1}$. Here $\varepsilon_{t+1}$ is the innovation, the unpredictable component of future volatility.

Unpredictability in the volatility is bad since it creates an uncertainty in the optimal portfolio decision, especially when the volatility is higher than expected. This means that assets which are highly correlated to the innovations $\varepsilon_{t+1}$ (that have high sensitivities) are attractive and will hence have lower average return as demand increase the price of those assets (by assumption).

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Without context, I am not 100% sure but this is my interpretation:

Just from wikipedia:

In time series analysis (or forecasting) — as conducted in statistics, signal processing, and many other fields — the innovation is the difference between the observed value of a variable at time t and the optimal forecast of that value based on information available prior to time t. If the forecasting method is working correctly, successive innovations are uncorrelated with each other, i.e., constitute a white noise time series.

Or more in relation to your case:

If you look at a time series model for volatility, say for example a GARCH model:

$$ h_t = \omega + \alpha \epsilon_{t-1}^2 + \beta h_{t-1}$$

then $\epsilon_{t-1}$ would be the innovation. In the discrete time models, the Brownian term takes the role of the innovator. In a Heston model for example, you have one mean reverting term and one innovation term.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.