3
$\begingroup$

I am new to the whole concept of stochastic volatility so I am experimenting with option pricing. I think the concept is really difficult to understand / grasp.

I was wondering if the following approach is way of or an appropriate strategy:

At day 0 I want to price a European Call with the underlying asset $S$ option that expires at time $T$. I observe market data for European Call options on $S$ with different strikes. Then I do the following:

  • Observe market data (IV for different strikes for an option on $S$) and fit SABR to it to find estimates for $(\alpha,\beta,\rho)$

  • Now that I have the SABR parameters: For a given strike ($K1)$ I comute it's volatility: $\hat{\sigma}_{K1} = \sigma_{SABR}(K1;\alpha,\beta,\rho)$

  • Then I price the option with strike $K1$ with the naive Black Scholes formula and set volatility to $\hat{\sigma}_{K1}$

Is this a descent aproach for option pricing? Will my Call price with strike $K1$ be close to what is "real" fair value

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, the procedure you described is fairly correct. Make sure that the option market data has the same maturity. In this sense, SABR is an interpolation tool. $\endgroup$ – Jaehyuk Choi Oct 12 '18 at 3:07
1
$\begingroup$

In your first step, you will want to calibrate $\alpha, \rho, \nu$, and probably not $\beta$. See the related question Calibrate a SABR model?

How close your option price is from the market price will depend on the fit quality. SABR has only a few parameters and does not necessarily match well equity or equity index options of short maturities. It is more appropriate for foreign exchange options or interest rate swaptions.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.