-2
$\begingroup$

Hi I am reviewing the example of Barra risk model in the following document page 23 there is the statement:

"Estimating a covariance matrix for, say, 3,000 stocks requires data for at least 3,000 periods.

Why the number of periods has to be [greater than or] equal to the number of stocks?

Covariances and variances of the stocks can be measured for any number of periods, cannot they? I don't get the point here. Can anybody please clarify?

| improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If you use less than 3000 periods the resulting variance covariance matrix will not be positive definite (it will be only positive semidefinite). This causes some problems when working with such a $\Sigma$ matrix (although there are also ways to get around them). For example $\Sigma^{-1}$ will not exist :(( $\endgroup$ – Alex C May 14 '18 at 0:50
0
$\begingroup$

Look at the matrix A=[X1, X2, ... Xn]. Xn is a time series with m points for stock n, then A is a matrix with size mxn. Think A as a information transformation from time space to stock space. if m < n, obviously you cannot recover all information of n stock. Or put it in a another way, you cannot identify which stock with any given time series if m < n.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.