The ATM implied volatility is important in SABR when calibrating the model. Let's consider the ATM vol (for a european call option): $$\sigma = \frac{\alpha}{f^{1-\beta}} \left[ 1+ \left(\frac{(1-\beta)^2}{24}\frac{\alpha^2}{f^{2-2\beta}}+\frac{1}{4}\frac{\rho \beta v}{f^{1-\beta}}+\frac{1}{24} (2-3\rho^2)v^2 \right)T \right]$$ where $v$ is rest is obvious and same notation is used in Hagans original paper.

However, it commonly mentioned in literature that this volality can be estimated by first term: $$\sigma \approx \frac{\alpha}{f^{1-\beta}}$$

How does one proof/show that claim?

https://www.next-finance.net/IMG/pdf/pdf_SABR.pdf

  • It is pretty obviuos when you look at the terms and some become really small. I can also demonstrate it graphically. But I still want a better argument that this hold for all values of the parameters – Kim Sep 14 at 6:41

Your Answer

 

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.