2
$\begingroup$

Currently studying some papers on Behavioral Finance (the dividend puzzle), which employ some basic valuation models, calculating stock's fundamental value $P_t$. The most known is the discount of future cash flows(Dividends $D$), assuming some growth rate $g$. But this model totally ignores an embedded option, with reference to potential liquidation of the position:get the capital gains or continue holding stocks to get the scheduled dividends.

More formally, the Gordon model says: $$P_0=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{D_n}{(1+r_n)^n}$$

Where $D_n$ and $r_n$ the suitable dividend and discount rate for the period (depends on the dividend payout frequency).

But, if we think about it, stock embodies an American option with maturity $T$, equal to the investment horizon. One should liquidate his position on time $t<T$, if stock price at time $t$, $S_t> P_t$, where $P_t=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{D_n}{(1+r_n)^n}$, where $P_t$ the PV of dividends at time $t$.

Hence, a better valuation would be: $$P_0'=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{D_n}{(1+r_n)^n}+P_{Call_{American}}(S_T>P_t)$$

Is there any source addressing this issue, or I have just made a huge innovation in Quantitative Finance (hehe).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How more precisely is the stock price impacting the fundamental value of the firm in your model? $\endgroup$ – Mats Lind Oct 22 '18 at 7:39
  • $\begingroup$ Fundamental value of a stock should reflect the value of all rights embodied in the share. That means the right to sell at any give moment (assuming some elementary liquidity), the right to receive a portion of profits (which translates to dividends or retained earning might lead to capital gains). $\endgroup$ – Coxswaiiiin Oct 22 '18 at 8:25
  • $\begingroup$ Wouldn't you be better off separating the fundamental value available to all stockholders from the total value available to those agents who are able to identify the fundamental value at time t and optimally excercise the call in your valuation? $\endgroup$ – Mats Lind Oct 22 '18 at 8:38
1
$\begingroup$

If you assume the Gordon-Model to be the correct approach for evaluating a certain company, then $P_{Call_{American}}(S_T>P_t)$ equals zero.

The stock price at time $t$ is $$P_t=\sum_{n=t+1}^{\infty}\frac{D_n}{(1+r_n)^n}=S_T$$

As $P_t$ equals $S_T$, the value of the option is zero. Hence, the Gordon-model ignores your suggested option because the assumptions make it unnecessary.

Be aware of some problems with the model and consider other approaches in asset pricing: Your question somehow points to the field of real options, so let me recommend you this paper, which matches behavioral finance with the theory of real options.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.