We already know the equivalence between local vol, implied vol and option price and there are one-one maps between pairs: $$(\sigma_{local},K),\ (\sigma_{implid},K),\ (C,K)$$ here $K$ is the strike and $C$ is the call price. And the one-one maps are determined by Black-Scholes formula.

And we know that one of the no-arbitrage condition is that call price $C$ should be a convex function against the strike $K.$

So, given some market equivalent sample points $$(\sigma^i_{local},K^i),\ (\sigma^i_{implid},K^i),\ (C^i,K^i)$$ assume they meet the no arbitrage condition as precondition, then we know that linear interpolation of implied vol $\sigma^i_{implid}$ is not allowed.

My question is whether linear interpolation of local vol $\sigma^i_{local}$ is allowed? Since linear interpolation of market price $C^i$ seems allowed.

If linear interpolation of local vol $\sigma^i_{local}$ is allowed, what's the reason? It seems related to the convexity of the maps between $(\sigma^i_{local},K^i)\ (C^i,K^i)$ and $(\sigma^i_{implid},K^i),\ (C^i,K^i).$


1 Answer 1


Any specification of the local volatility surface produces non-arbitrageable prices (as long as it is guaranteed that resulting local volatilities are always positive). The reason is that any (positive) lv surface specifies a unique, consistent, arbitrage-free (Dupire) model, which, by construction, produces mutually consistent, arbitrage-free prices. By contrast, the surface of call prices (or equivalently of implied volatilities) does not constitute the parameter set of a unique, arbitrage-free model, therefore any (positive) surface of prices or ivs is not guaranteed arbitrage-free. It is well known that call prices must be above intrinsic, increasing in maturity, decreasing and convex in strike, which translates in non-trivial ways in terms of iv. May I refer to my volatility lectures for further details? https://www.slideshare.net/AntoineSavine/lecture-notes-from-volatility-modelling-lectures-at-copenhagen-university


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.