1
$\begingroup$

Source: Investments 10th Edition by Bodie, Zvi. Page 227 Chapter 7 enter image description here

In Equation 7.17, the book breaks the variance into two parts. I can't seem to understand why the 1/n is represented outside the summation part in the first part of the equation. Also, shouldn't there be a single n given that there are n observations representing variance in the covariance table?

New contributor
Rajat Yadav is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The first part of equation 7.17 is just the contribution of the portfolio variance from the variance of the individual assets (j=i, the asset equals itself). It is the squared weights times just the diagonal of the variance-covariance matrix. The second part of the equation 7.17 is the contribution of the covariances of all the assets. It is the contribution of all the other elements of the variance-covariance matrix other than the diagonal. As you can see it is where the asset does not equal itself (j<>i).

If you just use equation 7.16, using 1/n as the weights, you will get the same answer.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

Rajat Yadav is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.