According to chapter 17 of Ross's Corporate Finance (Brazilian translation of 2nd edition),

$$ r_{WACC} = \frac{S}{S+B}r_S + \frac{B}{S+B}r_B(1 - T) $$


$$ r_S = r_0 + \frac{B}{S}(1 - T)(r_0 - r_B) $$

where $S$ is equity, $B$ is debt, $T$ is tax rate, $r_0$ is the unlevered cost of equity, $r_S$ is the levered cost of equity, and $r_B$ is the cost of debt.

By replacing $r_S$ in the first formula and simplifying, I get

$$ r_{WACC} = \Bigg{(}\frac{S + B(1 - T)}{S + B}\Bigg{)}r_0 $$

which would mean the weighted average cost of capital does not depend on the cost of debt, $r_B$. This formula yields the same WACC as the one in the book, and I checked on some other examples as well.

Did I get this right? If so, is this because the higher tax shield compensates the additional risk from higher interest payments? If not, what am I doing wrong?


Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.