I've read a lot of derivations about VIX formula. I can say it is -adjusted- fair strike of variance swap. But I can't see how it goes from variance swap rate to VIX formula. In particular I can't see the last part of VIX formula hosted here on page 4.

Could you please lead me from Hull Technical Note 22:

\begin{equation} \ E(V)= \frac{2}{T}ln\frac{F_{0}}{S^{*}} - \frac{2}{T}\left[ \frac{F_{0}}{S^{*}}-1\right] +\frac{2}{T}\left[\int_{K=0}^{S^{*}} \frac{1}{K^{2}}e^{RT}p(K)dK + \int_{K=S^{*}}^{\infty} \frac{1}{K^{2}}e^{RT}c(K)dK\right] \end{equation}

to VIX Formula \begin{equation} \sigma^{2}= \frac{2}{T}\sum_i^{}\frac{\triangle K_{i}}{K_{i}^{2}}e^{RT}Q(K_{i}) - \frac{1}{T}\left[ \frac{F}{K_{0}}-1\right]^{2} \end{equation}

  • $\begingroup$ The determination of Vix is quite involved, using the implied volatility of listed options and weighs them by how far they are OTM. The CBOE website has the calculation methodology. $\endgroup$
    – AlRacoon
    Mar 3 '19 at 17:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AlRacoon yes it has methodology as I attached to this post. But it doesn’t involve derivation. $\endgroup$ Mar 3 '19 at 17:45
  • $\begingroup$ It is clear that the $\Delta K_i$ come discretizing the integral - is it? $\endgroup$
    – Ric
    Mar 3 '19 at 19:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Richard Yes it is. What about first part of Hull's equation and last term in VIX white? Can we say it is just an approximation ? $\endgroup$ Mar 3 '19 at 19:32
  • $\begingroup$ @TryingtobeQuant yes, it is the second order approximation of the logarithm of 1+x as discussed below in the answer $\endgroup$
    – Ric
    Mar 4 '19 at 10:43

The piece you are missing is an approximation via the Taylor formula of the logarithm:

$$\ln(1+x) \approx x-\frac{x^2}{2} \; .$$

Apply this to the first term in the final formula of the technical paper:

$$\frac{2}{T}\ln\frac{F_{0}}{S^{*}} = \frac{2}{T}\ln\left(1+\left(\frac{F_{0}}{S^{*}}-1\right)\right) \approx \frac{2}{T}\left(\left(\frac{F_{0}}{S^{*}}-1\right) - \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{F_{0}}{S^{*}}-1\right)^2\right) \;.$$

Now, the first term of this approximation cancels with the second term of the technical paper formula. You're left with the quadratic term.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.