We have a notion of natural filtrations, which intuitively represents the history of the process as the process evolves over time.

We also have a notion of filtrations in general, which are increasing sequence of sub-sigma algebras.

Naturally, the latter concept is more abstract than the former, and I am having trouble getting a concrete grip on the latter.

In particular, if we have a stochastic process X, and a filtration F, I tend to look at F as a natural filtration (although we only know it's a filtration in general, and not necessarily a natural one) of some other process Y. Can we do that?

As to why I am doing what I am doing, in many practical scenarios, we would be directly observing the process Y (say Y is the share price process) and hence our information would be the natural filtration of Y, but we might be interested in a slightly different process X (which might be the log of the share price or some other functional transformation say). In this scenario, the natural filtration of Y is simply a filtration from the perspective of X, and not a natural one.

Thanks a lot in advance!

  • $\begingroup$ I believe the natural filtration of a process is the same as the natural filtration of a bijective transformation of that process. The example that comes to mind is a stock price modelled as a geometric Brownian motion $S_t$ governed by a standard Brownian motion $W_t$. Now, the knowledge of $W$ implies the knowledge of $X$, i.e. $\sigma ( W_t ) = \sigma (X_t)\ \forall t$, where $\sigma(\cdot)$ represents the sigma-algebra generated by the process at all times. As to whether all filtrations are natural filtrations of some process, I am not sure. $\endgroup$
    – AdB
    Mar 18, 2019 at 9:10

1 Answer 1


Essentially, yes. And you will even by able to choose your process to be a martingale. Indeed, assume $\lbrace\mathcal{F}_{n}\rbrace_{n\ge 0}$ is some (for simplicity) countable filtration on $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})$. Let $X$ be some integrable rv and set \begin{equation} X_{n}:=\mathbb{E}[X|\mathcal{F}_{n}]. \end{equation} Then, $(X_{n})$ is a martingale, also called 'Doob's martingale', and a model for information accumulation. Clearly, by construction $\lbrace\mathcal{F}_{n}\rbrace$ is its natural filtration.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.