4
$\begingroup$

I am looking at linear combination of two forecasts (Bates and Granger, 1969). I would like to understand how to prove that the expected squared error associated with the optimal combination weight is smaller than the minimum of 2 forecast variances. I have come across it quite a number of times in literature and textbook. However, after giving it much thought, I am still unable to prove it.

Below I have attached the proof. I have successfully managed to prove up to step 7.28. I am just left the last line boxed in blue to understand. Thank you!

enter image description here enter image description here

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The function under study is a quadratic form that is positive semidefinite. The critical point is therefore a global minimum. If the minimum does not lie between 0 and 1, then simply choose the smaller of the two variances.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Hi: I think what user`8764 is saying is that you can take the derivative of the function, solve for the minimum ( k*) and be sure that it's not a local minimum because the second derivative of the function is positive and he function is quadratic ( the two imply that function is convex ). $\endgroup$
    – mark leeds
    Apr 6, 2019 at 14:40
  • $\begingroup$ and, I left out his main point which is that, if k* doesn't lie between zero and one when solved for, then find the values at k = 0 and k = 1 and take the minimum. $\endgroup$
    – mark leeds
    Apr 6, 2019 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ It's implied that he knows how to minimize the function given that he's derived up to the inequality. He just needs to remember that a quadratic funcrion has a single optima, which is the crux of his question. $\endgroup$
    – user18764
    Apr 6, 2019 at 21:23
  • $\begingroup$ no problem. I was just trying to clarify. your answer was great. $\endgroup$
    – mark leeds
    Apr 8, 2019 at 0:39
  • $\begingroup$ @user18764 you have been of great help! I really appreciate it (: $\endgroup$
    – fauxpas
    Apr 8, 2019 at 16:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.