4
$\begingroup$

I am trying to simulate on Python random paths for a general asset price as described by the Heston model:

\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} dS_t &= \mu S_t dt + \sqrt{\nu_t} S_t dW^S_t \\ d\nu_t &= \kappa(\theta - \nu_t) dt + \xi \sqrt{\nu_t} dW^{\nu}_t \\ \textrm{Corr}[W^S_t, W^{\nu}_t] &= \rho \end{aligned} \end{equation}

where:

  • $W_t^{S}$ and $W_t^{\nu}$ are two standard Brownian motions with correlation $\rho$.
  • $\nu _{t}$ is the instantaneous variance.
  • $\mu$ is the rate of return of the asset.
  • $\theta$ is the long variance.
  • $\kappa$ is the rate at which $\nu_t$ reverts to $\theta$.
  • $\xi$ is the volatility of the instantaneous volatility.

Hence I implemented the following function:

def HeMC (S0, mu, v0, rho, kappa, theta, xi, T, dt):

    # Generate a Monte Carlo simulation for the Heston model

    # Generate random Brownian Motion
    MU  = np.array([0, 0])
    COV = np.matrix([[1, rho], [rho, 1]])
    W   = np.random.multivariate_normal(MU, COV, T)
    W_S = W[:,0]
    W_v = W[:,1]

    # Generate paths
    vt    = np.zeros(T)
    vt[0] = v0
    St    = np.zeros(T)
    St[0] = S0
    for t in range(1,T):
        vt[t] = np.abs(vt[t-1] + kappa*(theta-np.abs(vt[t-1]))*dt + xi*np.sqrt(np.abs(vt[t-1]))*W_v[t])
        St[t] = St[t-1]*np.exp((mu - 0.5*vt[t])*dt + np.sqrt(vt[t]*dt)*W_S[t])

    return St, vt

The problem is that when I run this function with the following parameters I often obtain paths which seems not to make sense. Especially the instantaneous volatility does not seem mean-reverting but it often follows wild paths.

T     = 252
dt    = 1/252
S0    = 100 # Initial price
mu    = 0.1 # Expected return
sigma = 0.2 # Volatility
rho   = -0.2 # Correlation
kappa = 0.3 # Revert rate
theta = 0.2 # Long-term volatility
xi    = 0.2 # Volatility of instantaneous volatility
v0    = 0.2 # Initial instantaneous volatility

enter image description here

I believe the problem is in the way I discretised the process or maybe there are some bugs in my code but I could not find anything.

Thanks for your help.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Without looking at your code, the initial volatility and the long run mean seems to be pretty high. Remember, that you model the variance $v_t$ and not the standard deviation, so try to use 0.04 as the respective values and see what happens. $\endgroup$ – JohnDoe Apr 6 at 9:04
  • $\begingroup$ @johndoe, looking at the code, you're correct. $\endgroup$ – will Apr 7 at 9:30
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnDoe yes you are right, I badly calibrated the model. Recalling that its actually variance and not volatility, I adjusted the values for v0, theta and kappa and now works perfectly fine. $\endgroup$ – Daniele Rocchi Apr 7 at 22:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.