Which of the two calculations below, is wrong? Why?

$dF = \sigma F dW$


$dF^2 = (F^2)' dF + \frac{1}{2}(F^2)''dF.dF$

$dF^2 = 2F dF + dF.dF$

$dF^2 = 2 \sigma F^2 dW + \sigma^2 F^2 dt$

$\frac{dF^2}{F^2}=2\sigma dW + \sigma^2 dt$

$d \ln F^2=2\sigma dW + \sigma^2 dt$



$d \ln F^2 = (\ln F^2)' dF + \frac{1}{2}(\ln F^2)'' dF.dF$

$d \ln F^2 = \frac{2F}{F^2} dF + \frac{1}{2} (\frac{2F}{F^2})' dF.dF$

$d \ln F^2 = \frac{2}{F} dF +\frac{1}{2} (\frac{2}{F})' dF.dF$

$d \ln F^2 = \frac{2}{F} dF +\frac{1}{2} \frac{-2}{F^2} dF.dF$

$d \ln F^2 = \frac{2}{F} dF - \frac{1}{F^2} dF.dF$

$d \ln F^2 = 2\sigma dW - \sigma^2 dt$

Just for context, I am trying to understand the calculation of In-Arears Swap pricing. So, need to compute expectation of "Square of Forward rate".

The book (Brigo Mercurio) says $E(F(T)^2)=F(0)^2 e^{\sigma^2 T}$

My computations above (Second) tells me that $E(F(T)^2)=F(0)^2 e^{-\sigma^2 T}$

I am stuck and unable to explain the "-" sign before $\sigma^2 dt$ which I see.

Ref: Brigo and Mercurio "Interest Rates Models - Theory and Practice" Second Edition, Part V, Chapter 13, Equation 13.3

  • $\begingroup$ I'd say the first one is wrong because $dF^2 / F^2 \neq d\ln F^2$. You are shoving some second order terms under the rug in this step. $\endgroup$ – Raskolnikov Apr 25 '19 at 7:05
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for confirming, I also thought this step had an issue. However, the <b>Second</b> also has some other issue, since the answer I get is wrong. The correct answer (as per various literature) is that the sign should be "+" for the $\sigma^2 dt$ term $\endgroup$ – bhutes Apr 25 '19 at 7:08

The second solution is correct, so the solution at t is:

$F_t^2=F_0^2e^{2 \sigma W_t-\sigma^2t}$

Now apply expectation to both sides.

$ E\left[F_t^2\right]=F_0^2 \, E\left[e^{2 \sigma W_t-\sigma^2t}\right]$

The term in the exponent is just Gaussian so let’s call it X: $X=2 \sigma W_t-\sigma^2t$

It’s mean and variance are:


$V[X]=4 \sigma^2t$

And hence: $E[X]+\frac{1}{2}V[X]=\sigma^2t$

And therefore: $ E\left[F_t^2\right]=F_0^2 \, E\left[e^{X}\right] =F_0^2 e^{\sigma^2t}$

For the mean and half the variance business above, please see the discussion here:https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/176196/calculate-the-expected-value-of-y-ex-where-x-sim-n-mu-sigma2

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Now I understand it. $\endgroup$ – bhutes Apr 26 '19 at 0:10

The first one is wrong.

As I said in my comment, you seem to be shoving some terms under the rug. In fact:

$$d\ln F^2 = \frac{1}{F^2}dF^2 + \frac{1}{2}(-\frac{1}{F^4})dF^2\cdot dF^2 \; .$$

Which leads to

$$d\ln F^2 = \frac{1}{F^2}dF^2 - 2\sigma^2dt \; .$$

Hence with this correct substitution in the first computation, both computations will lead to the same result.

By the way, $\ln F^2 = 2\ln F$. This gives an even more straightforward confirmation that this is the correct formula.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. This calculation improved my understanding by a huge amount. $\endgroup$ – bhutes Apr 25 '19 at 7:42

I just want to offer an alternative approach to the problem. I simply used Ito's Lemma. We have $$ dF_t = \sigma F_t dW_t.$$ Now, we want to know the dynamics of $\ln F_t^2$ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%C3%B4%27s_lemma). We set $f(t, x) = \ln x^2$ and get the derivatives $$ \frac{\partial f(t, x) }{\partial t} = 0, \quad \frac{\partial f(t, x)}{\partial x} = \frac{2}{x}, \quad \frac{\partial^2 f(t, x)}{\partial x^2 }= -\frac{2}{x^2}$$ It follows \begin{align*} df(t,F_t) & = \frac{\partial f(t, x) }{\partial t}dt + \frac{\partial f(t, x)}{\partial x} dF_t + \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^2 f(t, x)}{\partial x^2 }(dF_t)^2\\ & = 0 + \frac{2}{F_t}\sigma F_t dW_t + \frac{1}{2}\frac{-2}{F_t^2}\sigma^2F_t^2dt\\ & = 2\sigma dW_t -\sigma^2dt \end{align*}

You probabably did it the same way as I. However, this is also to show an easy application of Ito's Lemma to a maybe not so sophisticated reader.

| improve this answer | |

the second one is correct because you have used the right tools to compute $d \ln F^2$.

In the first one everything up to the last conclusion is correct.


$$ \frac{dF^2}{F^2} = 2\sigma dW + \sigma^2dt $$

does not imply $$ d \ln F^2 = 2\sigma dW + \sigma^2 dt. $$

This is only true if $F$ would not be raised to the power of two.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Agree. The answer I get in the Second is wrong (some other issue, I think). The link quant.stackexchange.com/questions/31950/… says the $\sigma^2 dt$ should have a "+" sign. $\endgroup$ – bhutes Apr 25 '19 at 7:13
  • $\begingroup$ I don't see anything in that link that indicates there should be a "+" sign. $\endgroup$ – Raskolnikov Apr 25 '19 at 7:17
  • $\begingroup$ From the result of $d \ln F^2$ could you obtain the result for $E(F^2)$. In the literature, it says it should be $F(0)^2e^{\sigma^2 T}$. Note, it is not $e^{-\sigma^2 T}$ $\endgroup$ – bhutes Apr 25 '19 at 7:23
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but note $T$ is also the terminal time. Who's to say that there's no cancelation of signs going on here? Can you show more explicitly what you are aiming to do? $\endgroup$ – Raskolnikov Apr 25 '19 at 7:33
  • $\begingroup$ I am trying to understand the calculation of In-Arears Swap pricing. So, need to compute expectation of "Square of Forward rate". The book (Brigo Mercurio) says $E(F(T)^2)=F(0)^2 e^{\sigma^2 T}$. $\endgroup$ – bhutes Apr 25 '19 at 7:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.