I have the following general SV model:
$$ dS = \sigma S dW_S $$ $$ d\sigma = a(\sigma,t) dt + b (\sigma, t) dW_\sigma $$ $$ dW_S dW_\sigma = \rho dt $$ where $a , b$ are deterministic functions of $\sigma$ and $t$ only, and $\rho$ is constant.
My question is the following:
Suppose that for any value of the spot, at any time before maturity of a vanilla call option, there is a strike where the sensitivity of the implied volatility to correlation is zero, that is $$ \Sigma_\rho = 0 $$ where subscripts denotes partial derivative, and where the implied volatility is of course defined as follows: $$ C^{BS} (S,t,K,T;\Sigma) = C^{SV} (S,t,K,T;\sigma) $$ where the subscript "BS" means Black-Scholes price, and "SV" means stochastic vol model price.
What can we then say about $$ \Sigma_{S \sigma} = ? $$ My conjecture is that the second order derivative above will be zero at the strike where the sensitivity of the implied volatility to correlation is zero. But I cannot prove it precisely.
The hand-waving argument is as follows. Since $\Sigma$ is stochastic, $$ d\Sigma = \Sigma_t dt + \Sigma_S dS + \Sigma_\sigma d\sigma + \frac{1}{2} \Sigma_{S S} (dS)^2 + \frac{1}{2} \Sigma_{\sigma \sigma} ( d\sigma)^2 + \Sigma_{S \sigma} dS d\sigma $$
The term involving $dS d\sigma$ above will contain $\rho$, and intuition suggests that $\Sigma$ would be independent of $\rho$ if $\Sigma_{S \sigma} = 0$, but of course this is not a hard-proof.
I would be more than satisfied to restrict the question to the case where $\rho = 0$ to start with, i.e. a symmetric smile. [Needless to say a symmetric smile doesn't mean there is no sensitivity to correlation.]
Any help appreciated. This is a research question by the way, so not expecting a full answer, but some ideas would be great.