3
$\begingroup$

For example, distance = speed * time, m = m/s * s.

But this technique gives wrong answer on the Black Scholes formula. The square root in the denominator gives wrong unit inside of the culumulative probability function.

Is this because some assumptions used in the equation fundamentally changed the dimension? What is the fundamental reason for the dimension to be inconsistant?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
9
$\begingroup$

$C= S_0 N(d_1) - K e^{-rT} N(d_2)$

$C$, $S_0$ and $K$ have units of currency (e.g. USD).

$N(d1)$ and $N(d_2)$ are unit-less (dimensionless), the formula is dimensionally correct.

Considering,

$d1 = \frac {ln{\frac {S_0} K} + r T + \frac {\sigma^2} {2} T} {\sigma \sqrt T }$

$r$ and $\sigma^2$ have units of "per year", as they are stated on an annualized basis.

So, $\sigma$ has unit of "square root of "per year"".

Hence, $d1$ is also dimension-less.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! I realized my interpretation of the unit of variation is wrong. This answer is very helpful! $\endgroup$
    – user40979
    May 10, 2019 at 12:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.