3
$\begingroup$

I am trying to solve this problem

Consider the following one-dim. stochastic process
$$dX_t = b_t dt + \sigma_t dW_t$$ where $W$ is a one-dim. Brownian motion. The above SDE is well-defined. Consider a smooth and bounded function $g$, and put $$ Z_t := \exp(\int_0^t g(s,X_t)ds).$$ Calculate the stochastic differential $dZ$.

My answer:
Put $Y_t = \int_0^t g(s,X_t)ds$ . Then, it follow that $Z_t=e^{Y_t}$ , and from Ito formula, I have
$$dZ_t = Z_t(dY_t + \frac{1}{2}(dY_t)^2).$$ Thus, I want to know the stochastic differential $dY$.
If I can say that $$dY_t=g(t,X_t)dt$$ then, $$dZ_t = Z_t \bigl(g(t,X_t)dt + \frac{1}{2}(g(t,X_t)dt)^2 \bigl)$$ $$\Leftrightarrow dZ_t = Z_t g(t,X_t)dt .$$ follows.


My question: I am not sure if I can say that $$dY_t=g(t,X_t)dt.$$ I suspect that my answer is too simple to be true. Where did I make a mistake?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I am also not so sure you can say $dY_t=g(t,X_t)dt.$. In order to get Y differential I would define $f(t,x) =\int_0^t g(s,x)ds$ and then compute $f(t,X_t)$ through Ito Lemma. $\endgroup$
    – loxol
    May 25, 2019 at 14:23
  • $\begingroup$ @loxol I also guess that I need Ito formula to calculate $ dY $. <br> However, I have no idea how I can compute $ f(t,x) = \int_0^t g(s,x)ds $ through Ito formula. What is $ \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \int_0^t g(s,x)ds $ and $ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \int_0^t g(s,x)ds $? $\endgroup$
    – David Khan
    May 26, 2019 at 6:05

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

In your notation, $$ dY_t = g(t,X_t) dt + \int_0^t dg(s,X_t) ds $$ where $$ dg(s, X_t) = \partial_{X_t} g(s,X_t) dX_t + \frac{1}{2} \partial^2_{X_t} g(s,X_t) (dX_t)^2 $$ The rest seems ok.

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Can you elaborate why the first equality holds? Does it use Ito lemmma as loxol pointed out? Seemingly, the second equation used Ito lemma. But why isn't partial derivative w.r.t. $t$ included? $X_t$ is a function of $t$, isn't it? $\endgroup$
    – David Khan
    May 26, 2019 at 6:13
  • $\begingroup$ Well, if you write $X_t$ in the integrand, and not $X_s$, then if you differentiate with respect to $t$ you will also need to differentiate $X_t$. It's like normal calculus, except since $X_t$ is stochastic you take the Ito differential. $\endgroup$
    – user34971
    May 26, 2019 at 8:07
  • $\begingroup$ I understand it, thanks. Let me ask one more thing on calculation. If I put $dX_t = b_tdt + \sigma_t W_t$ into $dg(s,X_t)$, then I have something like $\int_0^t (\partial_{X_t}g(s,X_t)b_tdt) dt $ and so on. Can I say that this is equivalent to $b_tdt\int_0^t (\partial_{X_t}g(s,X_t)) dt$? If this is true, then by Ito rule $\bigl((dt)^2=0\bigl)$, I hope I could get relatively neat result on $dZ$. $\endgroup$
    – David Khan
    May 26, 2019 at 9:44
  • $\begingroup$ You don't have $(dt)^2$ because the integral is over $ds$ from $0$ to $t$, and not over $dt$. $\endgroup$
    – user34971
    May 26, 2019 at 11:55
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry for my abbreviation. I'm not sure if my intention is understood. What I wanted to say is this: $dY_t = g(t,X_t)dt + \int_0^t(\partial_{X_t}g(s,X_t) dX_t + \frac{1}{2} \partial^2_{X_t} g(s,X_t)(dX_t)^2)ds$ = $...+\int_0^t(\partial_{X_t} g(s,X_t)(dX_t)ds+... $= $...+\int_0^t(\partial_{X_t} g(s,X_t) (b_tdt+\sigma_t dW_t)ds+...$= $...+\int_0^t\partial_{X_t} g(s,X_t) b_tdtds+... $ holds. And, $(dY_t)^2=...+(\int_0^t\partial_{X_t} g(s,X_t) b_tdtds)^2+... $ follows. $\endgroup$
    – David Khan
    May 27, 2019 at 9:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.